What other citation formats would you like Zotero to generate?
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
As a natural scientist I would also appreciate it if all the common formats are included, like Science: http://www.sciencemag.org/about/authors/prep/res/refs.dtl and Nature as mentioned above.
I also think the following resource for LaTeX Style and BiBTeX could be of some help with the biology reference styles:
http://www.lecb.ncifcrf.gov/~toms/latex.html
Vancouver would be a very high priority!
Vancouver style (uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals)Vancouver, a "numbered" style, follows rules established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors - http://www.icmje.org/. It is also known as: Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
nature
science
CELL
PLOS
PNAS
are essential, as mentioned by others before... also the vancouver style (as mentioned before).
AND ... for people who want to .CSL their own styles it would be REALLY helpful if there was a quick import .CSL function in zotero. can't be hard to do, but would making trial and error a lot easier...
tnx
For simple things like bibliography items XML is major overkill. it's both hard to read for humans, and hard to parse with any lightweight script.
YAML format solves both issues.
If you could develop an AAA style as well (spacing / indents are different, for one thing), that'd be great. Otherwise, I'll look forward to the more user-friendly method of customizing citations:
http://www.aaanet.org/pubs/style_guide.pdf
I think the priority should be on this utility. It needn't be complicated and in the medium to short-term it would save a lot of time generating the thousands of citation styles requested above. Even something with very basic functionality or capable of tweaking existing styles would be much appreciated as soon as it can be done...
Or better still make it a priority to allow users develop export styles - and ways to integrate them to wordprocessors, and the users will do all this themselves in no time.
In the plug-in model for downloading the citation style people work with, as has been suggested by others, is an excellent idea to finist this off.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science is
one of preferred formats for many conferences.
And as a law student, I've discovered that managing legal citations for law review articles and other more academic legal writings is a MAJOR pain...
We really need an easy-to-use web-based previewer and tester, though.
Wouldn't a Firefox extension be the nicest way to implement such a tool? It would be very handy to be able to test new CSL-styles using citations within your own Zotero collection.
I think easy MS Word integration and an extensive collection of output styles are two of the most important features that are still required to start drawing academic users in large numbers away from Endnote/Reference Manager.
A web-based tool would not only cater to these other users, but could hopefully build a publicly accessible database of styles. I see no reason a web-based tool couldn't make styles which could be tested with Zotero as easily as ones generated through a (non-zotero) firefox plugin.
In any case, the notion of distributed and web-accessible styles is central to my vision of CSL. Having to download and maintain style files in the 21st century is positively archaic.
Just to add my 2 cents to the wishlist, I'm an anthropologist and would therefore be interested in seeing the style used by the journals of the American Anthropological Association. (I may be able to do it myself if I can find the time to figure out how to create Zotero bibliography styles.) Basically, it looks something like this:
http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/DocAPSA.html
Author A, Author B, Author C and Author D. 2007. An example scientific reference. Journal of Zotero Forums 1(2): 3-4.
It should be fairly simple as they already follow the Chicago Manual 14th ed.:
"AAA uses The Chicago Manual of Style (14th edition, 1993) and Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (10th edition, 2000). This guide is an outline of style rules basic to our journal editing. Where no rule is present on this list, follow Chicago. "
Thus the pdf everyone has linked to might be easy to adapt based on the existing Zotero Chicago formats.
I should add that, because that edition of the Chicago Manual is a bit sparse on how to cite electronic formats, it might be worth looking at some issues of American Anthropologist or American Ethnologist to see how they have handled websites, PDFs, and other electronic media.