I also tested a ProQuest article and it saved just fine.

This is not only happening with SD, but with Proquest and other platforms

yeah, this only works on campus for me, too. Zotero doesn't import the item from the feed, but follows the link and imports there the same way you would when browsing to the site. If you're not authen

You search on Psycinfo on ProQuest - Yes - PsycInfo via Proquest

You search on Psycinfo on ProQuest

Proquest is the site we have to use. I am not sure what you mean? Can I set up a phone call with someone to go through the process with?

Is this specific to ProQuest? If you're importing lots of material from Proquest quickly, they start throttling your access, which would obviously mean that Zotero doesn't work anymore, too. Have you

https://search-proquest-com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/psycinfo/results/273A508D679D4AFBPQ/1?accountid=13158

The thing is I basically need to do that only once, and then maintenance is very low bandwidth. I can do them very slowly, like 4 a minute, this will only take two weeks. By hand it will never get don

If you are doing a systematic review, I’d recommend using actual databases, like ProQuest, Web of Science, or MEDLINE, rather than Google Scholar. In my experience, they tend to yield fewer false posi

This is a problem with the data supplied by ProQuest. You will need to contact them to correct it.

https://search.proquest.com/llba/docview/1417553333/5C689F34A5CD42C6PQ/1

Also for Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) on ProQuest, there are errors. Journal articles are ok, and books are downloaded as books but with the place and pages in the field for Publ

I was unable to import a record for this Proquest Central Ebook at all:

It's seems to have worked itself out. I opened the page in Firefox and had to do something to sign in to ProQuest through my institution and now all appears to be well. I guess I just wasn't signed in

ProQuest also throttles downloads. Have you tried manually clicking through to results after Zotero fails?

Thanks for the comment. I was referring to the NYT historical archive through ProQuest. Your link brings me to the database of the NYT self.

EBSCO specifically. It works in Proquest, Scopus and Web of science and Jstor.

Are some of these simply not working with the translator?

Would this be a error of me doing it wrongly or is this a general concern (regarding an updated ProQuest database for example)?