Upgrade Storagedstark
About
- Username
- dstark
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thanks, @bwiernik. I've edited the metadata for one of my Zotero resources as shown at the end of this post. For the Society of Biblical Literature style, the first footnote output should be: 1. Anthony C. Thiselton, The First Epistle to the Corint…
-
Thanks so much for the discussion, all. Sorry I apparently stopped getting emails about new posts in this thread, so I'm just catching up. From the discussion, it sounds like something has been updated that should allow Zotero to handle the situati…
-
Thanks, @adamsmith. It looks like there are nineteen lines in the style that aren't comments but contain "collection-title". Of these, four already include form="short" in the line. So, I left those alone. In the remaining fifteen lines, I've added…
-
Well I'll be. Thought for sure I'd tried that, but I guess not ... or not recently enough. Works like a charm. Thanks so much to you both!
-
Thanks, @bwiernik! Storing the series abbreviation that way makes sense. I'm a bit slow on the CSL side though. In looking through the file, I don't see an obvious place to make the edit to form="short". Could you clarify which line this is that …
-
Thank you all so much. That's all most helpful!
-
Thank you all so much! It looks like @bwiernik's suggestion is working like a charm so far in the side copy I made of the main SBL style. :-) Since this is a citation pattern that SBLHS asks for, is this something that would make sense to add back …
-
Thank you both. The "classic work" idea is an interesting one that sounds like it might work and also be beneficial to users of other styles (e.g., Chicago, Turabian). From what you're describing, @adamsmith, it sounds like there'd be a way to speci…
-
Ah, thanks @adomasven. That worked like a charm! I'll look forward to seeing the new citation interface when that comes out too. Thanks, again.
-
Okay, thanks so much @adamsmith.
-
I seem to recall that in prior versions of Zotero, you could clear what you'd done in manually editing a citation by opening the classic citation dialog box, and hiding the editor. The citation would then revert back to updating from the database ra…
-
@bwiernik, no, so far as I'm aware, SBL style still calls for including the DOI only when, per the press's post, "online journals that lack a print counterpart or are paginated differently than the print edition." Electronic journals whose paginatio…
-
@adamsmith, not a problem. I'm sure you all are working all sorts of magic, and we really do appreciate it. This version of the style looks like it fixes this issue perfectly too. So, thanks so much!
-
@adamsmith and @fbennett, just wanting to check in on the status of this fix. It looks like the most current version of the SBL style in the repository is still from 2018-05-22 13:06:26 where this issue still exists. If a fix is still pending, that…
-
Okay. Sounds great. I'm sure we'll get it straight. Glad to know from my end I wasn't missing something. I'll watch the repository for when the update comes through. Thanks, again!
-
@fbennett and @adamsmith, no worries. Thanks so much! I can't imagine how many inquiries you guys get each day, and we're so grateful for all you do! As far as this adjustment goes, I've tried on two different Windows 10 machines both running the l…
-
@adamsmith and @fbennett, sorry for the bother but just wanted to check in ... is the fix on this issue intentionally still pending? It sounded like "a small thing" on 2 May, but the current style in the repository is still the one from 28 April. So…
-
Ok. Great. Thanks so much to you both!
-
@adamsmith, thank you!
-
@damnation, thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to help. The output still has the uncondensed editor and translator information. :-/
-
Hmmm ... I do see the SBL style in the repository was updated as of 2018-04-28 20:58:59. Just to be thorough, I've removed the SBL style from Zotero, downloaded it afresh, and added it back. I've also completely refreshed notes from Zotero in the do…
-
That's great. Thank you so much!
-
@adamsmith, in the red-framed quick format one. But, if I go through the classic citation dialog, the output seems to be the same as I've described above also (assuming I don't go through "Show editor..." to apply the italics).
-
@fbennett, sorry for the delay in getting back with you on this inquiry. I believe the following would be correct for short-format citations in SBLHS: A single book, with a page locator: Talbert, Reading John, 22. [6.2.1]A numbered volume in multivo…
-
@fbennett, if I've input the data to Zotero properly in the above example, then it does look like the volume number should typically be absent from shortened citations per SBLHS, 2nd ed., §§6.2.23–6.2.25. Too, this issue only seems to appear when ci…
-
@fbennett, thank you. The ", p. " is gone. But, it looks like the volume number still appears. Thus, the output is Wood, Christ the Educator, vol. 23. when the following would seem to be more appropriate: Wood, Christ the Educator.
-
@dstillman, thank you so much! @adamsmith, thank you. Absolutely, will do.
-
Sounds great. Thank you so much.
-
@adamsmith, as it happens, SBL Press has just released a clarification about their stance on the new CMS "ibid." guidelines. No more ibid. but also no author-only footnotes. Apparently, SBLHS is going with author and short tile now in all instances.
-
@adamsmith, I'll certainly second @rrodriguez157's thanks for all you folks do to keep up with these changes. I've had some additional correspondence with SBL Press about the implications of CMS17 for SBLHS2. According to SBL Press, SBLHS2 defers t…