jimkreft

That's true- these are fairly nit-picky semantics. I guess it doesn't matter too much as long as the right CSL field mappings can be sorted out.

in Additional field needed for Map sheet number Comment by jimkreft April 23, 2015

Chiming in to support some way to support report chapters or sections. The USGS generates many of these kinds of reports, and the chapters are often cited individually: Here is one example of a multi-chaptered report that I would like to be abl…

in Changes to fields and item types for Zotero 5.1 Comment by jimkreft April 23, 2015

@adamsmith, your example is not a good one for sheets-as-volumes. That is a single publication that happens to be split into two sheets. you can see it here: http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_66043.htm In this case, sheets are akin to pages, …

in Additional field needed for Map sheet number Comment by jimkreft April 23, 2015

Success! Thanks to all, sometimes a second pair of eyes is critical. Now to generate bibliontology rdf for the rest of the publication types, and enable it for search.

in Bibliontology Journal Article import does not properly parse journal title Comment by jimkreft March 30, 2015

@zuphillip It appears that you are, in fact, correct. I could have sworn that I matched the Zotero Output exactly, but it appears that I did not. I will get the fix in on my end today and see if that fixes things- it almost certainly will, ba…

in Bibliontology Journal Article import does not properly parse journal title Comment by jimkreft March 30, 2015

@adamsmith it's been almost a month. No pressure, but could you please let me know if I should not display the bibliontology RDF for journal articles, or if a fix for this translator may be on the way and I should hold off. Thanks, Jim

in Bibliontology Journal Article import does not properly parse journal title Comment by jimkreft March 30, 2015

@adamsmith it's been 12 days. Any update on Bibliontology import?

in Bibliontology Journal Article import does not properly parse journal title Comment by jimkreft March 18, 2015

@adamsmith, thanks for looking into getting Bibliontology working better, and let me know if there is anything I can do on my end to make things easier. I am a big fan of standards too, though a standard that is not really adopted anywhere is somew…