I think the problem is to do with "number-of-pages" and have opened a new thread indicating as much: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/15102/21b2-problem-number-of-pages-issue/

Did you test whether the escaped HTML tags work in Zotero 2.1 beta?

Did you test whether pluralizing "issue" in your locale file works? The CSL schema doesn't specify which terms can be plural and which can't be, and citeproc-js might just be able to handle your modified version.

More French surprises: quotes.
With the French locale using “ ” as inner quotes, all apostrophes are being rendered double. Doesn't Zotero know an apostrophe from a single quote?

@MHSmith: Thanks for this report. That's certainly an unintended side-effect. I'll have to give it some thought and take a closer look, but off the top of my head ... The processor does discriminate between apostrophes and quotes, but it uses the "inner quote" string value for both when rendering. We probably need an "apostrophe" term in the locale file to straighten this out.

I have this fixed and tested locally. The change to the locale file (a separate term for "apostrophe") will need to be routed through the CSL group, and then the update will need to be populated across the distributed locale files. This might take awhile, but help is on the way.

(Edit: A post to the CSL list revealed a point that I probably should have noticed to start with: there is probably no need for a localized term for apostrophes. I've hard-coded the apostrophe character in the processor source, which will work its way in to a release, and thence into Zotero, in the near future.)

Thanks!

It has not been implemented in zotero for now.
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/8565/other-author-types/#Item_13

I don't know how that is implemented but I think that it will be possible to have both an editor and a editorial-director. The question is rather: if the editor and the editorial-director are the same person, how would csl display that:
"John Doe (dir.), John Doe (éd.)" or "John Doe (éd. et dir.)".

In csl 1.0, there is a editortranslator role: when one person is editor and translator. Is there a use case for a "editorialdirectoreditor" (ugh..) role?

BTW, I tried editortranslator and it didn't work (output: nothing), so I reverted to "editor translator" with a space, and no problem.

@MHSmith: re editortranslator, that is not a variable, but a label term for internal use by the processor. When the editor and translator are rendered as variable="editor translator", and the two names are identical, only one of them is printed, and the editortranslator label is applied.

We could indeed address identical values for editor & editorial-director in the same way, if a special label is needed for that case (J Jones, ed. & ed. dir. ?). Would only require a minor addition to CSL. Just let us know if it's required.

We could indeed address identical values for editor & editorial-director in the same way, if a special label is needed for that case (J Jones, ed. & ed. dir. ?). Would only require a minor addition to CSL. Just let us know if it's required.

That would rather be "J. Jones, éd. & dir." or "J. Jones, éd. et dir."

Can adjust ground to deal with it, but for a start, could you check the name elements in the specification, and indicate the category into which this one falls (i.e. fixed part of last name, dropping-particle, non-dropping particle)?

It's a dropping-particle.

Edit: Universal bibliographic control and international MARC programme, Names of persons : national usages for entry in catalogues, München, KG Saur, 1996.

Definitely a dropping particle, yes.

And the reverse order (bibliography) would be like this, in my style: "Arundel (Gérard d')"

Re: éd & dir, I can't think of a single instance where the case occurs. You can have both éd. and dir. in the same book, but they would be different people. Unless you had a team of people editing documents, say, with one of them supervising the whole work, but that is pretty theoretical, and anyway I suppose he would have to appear twice, once on his own as the director, and once among the others: A, B & C (éd.), A (dir.). So no, I can't see that "éd & dir" could be needed.

It works fine. And J.-L. is correct (J-L. is a typo, obviously). A giant's leap for French orthography in Zotero. Or should I say, a Frog's leap?

@Gracile: afterthoughts.

For bibliographical data specifically, "c." or "ca" (the more correct form in French I think) is probably more usual than v. But then Zotero can also be used for archival material and other documents, where I would use "v."

"And others": actually "et autres" is never used. Wouldn't it be better to substitute "et alii" (the long form, vs "et al.")

More important maybe: the verbal form for an editorial-director should be "sous la direction de" not "dirigé par".

There is one term I miss, probably because it isn't really used in English: "id." (feminine ead., plural iid./eid.), for the same author (citing a second title of his directly after the first one).
This can also be used for e.g. an article by an author in a book of his own (e.g. his collected essays): J. Doe, "Essay", in id., Container — just to make it clear that the container is not a collective work, since there can occasionally be some ambiguity about this. Or even in a collection of essays edited by the same author: … in id. (ed.), Container…

PS Is your latest version online again?