Zotero + Scrivener, converting citation markers (citekeys?) auto-generating bibliographies
1. http://davepwsmith.github.io/academic-scrivener-howto/ This workflow requires writing in Markdown. Is there a way to do this without writing in Markdown?
2. http://zotero-odf-scan.github.io/zotero-odf-scan/ This workflow requires LibreOffice. Is there a way to do this without downloading another word processor? I already have Microsoft Word. Comments elsewhere in this forum seem to indicate that this workflow is unreliable.
3. I have the Better Bibtex plugin in Zotero, which generates citekeys. This appears to be a highly requested popular feature, but is it only useful for the Markdown/Pandoc workflow for #1? Are BBT citekeys the same as citation markers?
4. Are there any other methods to accomplish my objectives? All of this seems very complicated. I guess I could compile my manuscript and export to .DOCX format with citation placeholders, then use the Zotero integration there. I am reading that some people have thousands of citations, but I “only” have 100+ which is annoying but not unmanageable with this method I suppose.
2. http://zotero-odf-scan.github.io/zotero-odf-scan/ This workflow requires LibreOffice. Is there a way to do this without downloading another word processor? I already have Microsoft Word. Comments elsewhere in this forum seem to indicate that this workflow is unreliable.
3. I have the Better Bibtex plugin in Zotero, which generates citekeys. This appears to be a highly requested popular feature, but is it only useful for the Markdown/Pandoc workflow for #1? Are BBT citekeys the same as citation markers?
4. Are there any other methods to accomplish my objectives? All of this seems very complicated. I guess I could compile my manuscript and export to .DOCX format with citation placeholders, then use the Zotero integration there. I am reading that some people have thousands of citations, but I “only” have 100+ which is annoying but not unmanageable with this method I suppose.
3. BBT does a lot more than generate citation keys. These citation keys are unrelated to the scan citation markers, although they could be said to both serve a similar purpose (indicate what item you want to reference at that place in the text).
4. That scrivener has such poor integration is so entirely by Literature & Latte's choice. Integration with reference managers is of no interest to them, and they offer no integration points so someone else can do it, even when a dead simple modification to Scrivener would already make things substantially more pleasant. There currently is no better integration than the 3 options you are already familiar with: RTF-scan, ODF-scan + ODF-scan plugin, and markdown + BBT plugin.
Thank you for your response, and I understand that this is the case with Scrivener.