Specify volume & page in cite? Does Zotero permit only one locator?
If I have a multi-volume book, and I want to cite a specific page in a specific volume, can that be specified in Zotero via the Word plugin?
I know that I can select either a volume or a page to cite as the locator, but it seems to only allow one at a time.
Is this a case where I should just specify it via a suffix?
(Often multi-volume books have sequential, cumulative page numbering throughout. This situation comes up rarely when the page numbers restart with each volume.)
(I see this was not possible in 2010. Has that changed? https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/15127/complex-locators-multivolume-again -- Ah, and 2013: https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/28934/multiple-locators)
I know that I can select either a volume or a page to cite as the locator, but it seems to only allow one at a time.
Is this a case where I should just specify it via a suffix?
(Often multi-volume books have sequential, cumulative page numbering throughout. This situation comes up rarely when the page numbers restart with each volume.)
(I see this was not possible in 2010. Has that changed? https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/15127/complex-locators-multivolume-again -- Ah, and 2013: https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/28934/multiple-locators)
Volume: 2, p. 12-14
The list of locator abbreviations is given on this page https://zotero-odf-scan.github.io/zotero-odf-scan/
(Actually, at least for pages, since any arbitrary text is allowed, we could just write a complex locator format, right?)
This isn't a big deal for me. I was just wondering if I was doing something wrong by not using an official method.
( @adamsmith interesting, thanks. I'm probably not going to need this for my relatively limited use of ODF scan, which is just for a special section of my thesis with hundreds of references in lists, so I won't mind the random time I need to add this in manually. Though it's good to have another way to enter it if needed.)
As you note, for very complex text strings, entering as a suffix instead is likely a more straightforward approach.