I tried to investigate and noticed that the checkServer method of Zotero.Sync.Storage.Mode.WebDAV.prototype performs an initial OPTIONS request to test if the server has WebDAV enabled and it accepts

The least of all benefits is having the ability to test things in a playground, so here’s the above in the liquid playground. Obviously if we implemented a quote filter it would be even smaller.

Doing the Advanced Search(AS) did get me the 2 test items with notes, but also gave me two entries that didn't have notes. Not sure why those came up as they have no notes and nothing in common with t

@dstillman Thank you very much for your guidance, I will test these plug-ins one by one, if there is a new discovery, I will post a reply here.

Test Style

https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/tree/50a4464df659360f3196bcc1d30c0012763977ed/test/fixtures/debug-bridge

allow picking citation style. We generally test accessibility with Voice Over. I'll see if we can improve the text reader feedback and general compatibility with JAWS.

Actually, I created "test", but I can't even find it in Group. So I can't manage or delete it. Fortunately, the issue seems to be fixed when I opened https://forums.zotero.org just now. Anyway, thanks

You're the owner of one group, "test", and you should be able to manage and delete it. You're an admin or member of other groups, not the owner.

I'd guess some better handling of unsupported zotero:// links in Zotero's protocol handler might help. It seems that zotero:// is already registered in the Windows registry to be handled by Zotero. Zo

I saw the first link actually goes to Scielo.co (Colombia) and it is indeed broken. Perhaps that messes the connector. I did another simple search to test (didn't check every link) but the same proble

the actual citation key as needed), so you could test that on the affected items.

problem may not be actually duplicate items. To test this you can use the check for duplicates utility. You can also view your library sorted by title and see if there are records with the same title

import sys
import webbrowser
if __name__=='__main__':
print("test", str(sys.argv))
selectlink = sys.argv[1].rsplit("|")[-1].strip()
#os.syste

One possible cause is that I moved some sections around both by cutting and pasting and by using Navigator. My experience in the past, (and with a new test document) though is that this doesn't break

Sure, I do systematic reviews and one of the teams made separate folders (blue) under the main collection (brown folder). They also did some test folders (blue). Then they put all the resources we nee

I downloaded the beta to test this out.

Yes, of course -- testing in LO 7.0 on Windows looks good:

Thanks, I had. I did a new test by deleting it again, and will post again if it did not work. For the moment it's kept just one bak file only. So good.

@lshaver7W You just need to drag & drop your PDF file into that viewer and test it. That is just an example PDF…