Upgrade Storagedamnation
About
- Username
- damnation
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
You're aware of this? https://www.zotero.org/styles?q=Wollongong
-
Again, adding a label to the Zotero field is not the correct way and might mean you need to manually delete it again at a later stage. I don't fully understand where you're publishing, but as I said already, we can show you where to find the old sty…
-
You can, of course, use the old SAA style if need be. The source code can be still found on our GitHub repository.
-
But the publisher switched to Chicago, and with that their naming convention. For your info, I made the SAA styles on behalf of them years ago and they got in touch with me to change it over to CMOS. So, I'd say stick with what Chicago says. I would…
-
We switched the SAA style to just point to Chicago. A few weeks ago. Hence you noticed this change. Does the Chicago manual require the number label also?
-
SAA recently switched over to Chicago, hence the change you noticed. I assume our Chicago styles do this the way Chicago is meant to do.
-
Buying storage has nothing to do with if the Connector works or now. See this guide to troubleshoot: https://www.zotero.org/support/troubleshooting_translator_issues Make sure to go through all 14.
-
Style available: https://www.zotero.org/styles?q=clinical-and-experimental-rheumatology (will take an hour if it's no available yet)
-
As was already mentioned, you'd need to modify the citation style.
-
We've seen quite a few AI-made style submissions of varying quality. And when we then send requests for changes the submitter doesn't necessarily know how to fix them or you get a whole new style that you now need to review from scratch. That usuall…
-
Solution/workaround for what? OP was talking about a variety of issues in their thread. Please make new threads for your specific problems.
-
I'd try with the latest version that only just came out: https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/releases
-
Is this required by iso690? A given style only does what it's programmed to do. So, if it's required, please share an example from the guidelines.
-
We just pushed a fix.
-
Turn on field codes, search for remnants of the old citation and delete the field codes. https://www.zotero.org/support/kb/word_field_codes/
-
Please make new threads. This is a thread from 2021. I assume you deleted an item that you had duplicated. That was, I'm afraid, the wrong of doing it and you should've merged them. An item can survive on its own in a given document and that's what …
-
You'd need to ask the Filevine folks to build an integration. (https://support.filevine.com/hc/en-us/categories/360000460071-Integrations)
-
Ist das ein Fehler im Stil?
-
I'm really wondering why you are building something if you haven't even tested out citation-phoenix yet. It's ready and easy to test out.
-
Nota bene, I've worked with SAA over the years on their styles. They just switched their style and journal styles over to follow Chicago. It's likely their guidance hasn't just been updated.
-
I came across this the other day: https://theciteshop.com/ Looks promising, as Cite Them Right is a rather large and complex style manual and our current 12th edition has many, many errors on top of being obviously outdated.
-
We left feedback: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/pull/8246
-
Zotero's note styles uses Word's footnot function. If you want to refer to a previous note use the Word own functionality to do so. Alternatively, use a numeric style as adamsmith mentioned. IEEE or one of the many hundred styles out there.
-
The last release is from 2 months ago and in the release notes the last version mentioned is Zotero 9. I assume the maker has not updated it.
-
I'd start with updating to version 10 as a first step.
-
What do you mean by "style code issue"? The SBL styles are maintained by the CSL team, not SBL.
-
Can you be more concrete and give an example? Then we can help better.
-
That's now merged, but will take a while till those translations are available within Zotero. I'm actually not sure how/when that happens. Regarding your question, I don't think that current CSL supports anything close to what you are asking. CSL i…
-
(please delete)
-
Our Basque CSL locale is currently translated about 56%. We'd welcome a PR: https://github.com/citation-style-language/locales/blob/master/locales-eu.xml And we might look into changing the order then for the locators.