emilianoeheyns
About
- Username
- emilianoeheyns
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
You can set this up with Zutilo
-
Right, that's a way more sensible reading. Sorry.
-
Zotero doesn't just delete references ... on pin/repin, I think BBT may have documentation on details of this BBT does not ever delete items from the library. There is no functionality in BBT that would lead to item deletion. It is troubling that th…
-
You can set BBT to automatically pin your citation keys: https://retorque.re/zotero-better-bibtex/installation/preferences/#automatically-pin-citation-key-after
-
Did the field turn orange for the first one? The leading empty brackets aren't supposed to show up in the citekey, they just signal to BBT to parse it as the legacy format.
-
Try [](Z)[auth.etal][year] or "(Z)" + authEtal2 + year
-
The syntax has changed; the old syntax still works, but needs a [ as the first character to detect legacy mode. I see now the error message explaining this (and what the equivalent new syntax is) is not shown; I'll fix that, but in the mean time, ad…
-
*technically* you could use BBT for this, but it's a pretty heavyweight solution to this problem.
-
You have probably gotten those items by importing a bibtex file. By default BBT will remember the imported key along with the item. The red pin isn't actually part of the key, it is just a sign that the key won't change when you change the item.
-
That was it -- I could have delved deeper, but I was told the extra field did not sync with or without BBT, and I took "sync" at face value.
-
Would a custom field even help much for that? The citation processor (as it stands today) doesn't know what to do with non-standard fields, so it will ignore them.
-
My goals are well summarized by the first two of three "problems" discussed here: ..... These fields are preserved and transferred to Zotero when you import the file, but they show up in the “Extra” field and aren’t easily filterable or sortable t…
-
But if you mean whether you can use the Zotero client from the command line without any interaction with the GUI, the answer is no. Something along those lines is planned, but no ETA (and still not sure it'd fulfill your use case). I use selenium fo…
-
You can make as many groups as you want, even if you are the only member of these groups. Each group acts as its own separate library.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSS6jN_vCbY
-
As a side note: if you use tex.note = what follows must be valid LaTeX, as BBT will just pass it out unchanged. If you use tex.note: BBT will escape as necessary.
-
Hello, I wonder if you have solved this problem, I have installed the "better BibTeX " add-on, but it seems useless. Better BibTeX is hardly "useless". A few thousand Zotero users seem to think otherwise. If you think you know better, please explain…
-
I can't access those logs, and please report this on the github project. That's where I do support.
-
Debug build expire after approximately one week. 7SRC3QIS-refs-euc does not contain the information I need. https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/2490 has a new debug build up.
-
I don't think I've seen an issue opened on this on github, so I'm assuming you have resolved your question.
-
If you open an issue on the bbt github page and submit a BBT debug ID there (one with -refs- in it) I can take a look. On the description above I don't really understand what your current situation is. If you import a bibtex file while BBT is insta…
-
Can't do anything without further feedback.
-
Yes. I understand how things look in your prefs screen, I don't understand why they look that way in your prefs screen. Please install it, turn on debug logging in the help menu, try to change the formula, then send a new debug log. Has the proble…
-
Rename it and change its ID in the header. Or use BBT.
-
The current zotero forums lack a few features that would really, really help (like markdown). Please change this running system. Maybe conservatively. But please do.
-
If you use Zotero exclusively for LaTeX (or at least exclusively for LaTeX for entries that have LaTeX math in their title), Better BibTeX will output marked LaTeX parts as-is.
-
Even the Github "issues" section is a better way to communicate with other users as-is. That is not my experience at all. I use github issues as my preferred way to structure comms around my plugins; the forums do a few crucial things which I *wish*…
-
People use rebiber not for formatting/normalization but for choosing the correct, official citations among the many (valid) available citations for a paper. Which is fine, but I'd recommend talking to the rebiber creators about their mangling of tit…
-
https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/2490 has a new build that contains logging. It is not a fix, just for diagnosis. Please turn on debug logging in the help menu, try to change the formula, then send a new debug log.
-
You can post it here.
Upgrade Storage