Upgrade Storageemilianoeheyns
About
- Username
- emilianoeheyns
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I've scheduled the release of Better BibTeX 6.7.109 which will have this, but specifically for biblatex (as the stackexchange post mentions); bibtex doesn't have documented rules for what fields are allowed in @misc (that I know of).
-
That will also delete any auto-exports you would have had. Support happens on github. 1400 items isn't really a large database.
-
There's still something wrong with it, I'm looking into it.
-
Blockquote
-
Html markup
-
ternary support turned out to be fairly easy, so that's in now.
-
Which is why BBT still treats it as a mixed-purpose field.
-
what to do with free text which is truly a note ? Preferably it should go in a separate note item, not the extra field. BBT does still support the extra field having fields and notes together, but having the extra field reserved for fields would mak…
-
And the developer tried to help. The issue is potentially fixed in .106
-
Problems with Better BibTeX should be reported at https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues. "Updated" probably means that the auto-export status shows a new completion timestamp -- why that was updated and not the export file is som…
-
It's coming back in Zotero 6 somewhere today, and I am prepping a PR for Zotero 7 to replace the existing sentence case with BBT sentencecase.
-
@jessenia.polack please open an issue on https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues
-
No magic; | is equivalent to ; except ; is allowed at the end of a formula where | is not. The "magic" is in the .len at the end. If that fails, the formula jumps to the next candidate, regardless of where it appears in the sub-formula. No way to f…
-
Even if you only suspect its Better BibTeX, please open an issue on https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues.
-
Is this the normal Zotero BibTeX export, or a Better BibTeX export? If the latter, please report on https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues
-
I've added it back for backwards compat in .101, but plugins are going to want to use the new field, because that will also work without BBT when the formal citation key field comes to Zotero.
-
https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/new/choose
-
https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/new/choose
-
auth.lower + authForeIni + year + ShortTitle.transliterate.skipwords.clean.capitalize.len; auth.lower + authForeIni + year + shorttitle(3,3); ternaries are coming but it's not a short-term thing. I need to finish Zotero 7 support first.
-
You are on an older BBT beta build. Newer builds have fixed this issue since. All BBT work for the Zotero beta happens on github. Please report any problems you experience there, but do check first if it is not already in the list of open problems …
-
BBT offers a few options for exporting urls in bibtex exports. Biblatex simply supports url fields, so there's nothing special to do there. What revtex expects I don't know - if it is its own processor, I might have to look at that at some point, b…
-
That's been broken for a while. I do still have a rewrite planned for this, but that's after better bibtex has been updated for Zotero 7.
-
@dcsw2 on MacOs you just drag the beta to any folder (eg Downloads), rename Zotero.app to Zotero-demo.app, and then drag that into Applications.
-
Ah, then the standard Zotero BibTeX translator (and therefore the Overleaf connection) does not support this. It is supported however in Word and in Better BibTeX exports, if you want to go this road you'll have to use dropbox or git to bring the BB…
-
The nocase formatting is a Zotero feature, so it may also work with the regular Overleaf integration. If not, https://retorque.re/zotero-better-bibtex/exporting/auto/#getting-your-bbt-generated-biblatexcitekeys-to-other-places
-
agree with @bwiernik, but if you want to keep fda in lowercase in a title: fda: Functional Data Analysis. R package version 5.5.1..
-
better bibtex is closing in on a working Z7 version. As far as I can tell, it will be days, not weeks. Updates on https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/2522
-
That's now the new behavior in BBT (once the test suite finishes)
-
The full text for `number` is The number of a journal or the volume/number of a book in a series. See also issue as well as §§ 2.3.7, 2.3.10, 2.3.11. With @patent entries, this is the number or record token of a patent or patent request. Normally th…
-
Unfortunately, bib(la)tex data quality in the wild is pretty bad, so even if in this specific case `13` is the issue number, I'm not sure that's meant to be so. Nick Bart will usually get back to me within a day on questions like this.