New Style, plz upload: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Hi,
I created a citation style for "Earth Surface Processes and Landforms" journal. A very comon journal in Geomorpohology.
The style is based on the "Geomorphology" style from the repository. It worked well for an article with +50 references. And perfectly simulates the instructions for authors citation:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291096-9837/homepage/ForAuthors.html
I deposited the file under the following link and would be pleased if someone could upload it to the repository.
Best regards,
Matthias Siewert
https://gist.github.com/1102519
I created a citation style for "Earth Surface Processes and Landforms" journal. A very comon journal in Geomorpohology.
The style is based on the "Geomorphology" style from the repository. It worked well for an article with +50 references. And perfectly simulates the instructions for authors citation:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291096-9837/homepage/ForAuthors.html
I deposited the file under the following link and would be pleased if someone could upload it to the repository.
Best regards,
Matthias Siewert
https://gist.github.com/1102519
Validate the style in 0.8.1., auto-update to csl 1.0
http://citationstyles.org/downloads/upgrade-notes.html#updating-csl-0-8-styles
and repost - also, the style currently doesn't actually link to itself, you should fix that.
thanks for your help. I updated the file. It validates now against csl 1.0. And perfectly emulates the journals example citation.
I do not understand what exactly you mean by "link to itself", but I hope the header is fine now.
I updated the original gist link:
https://gist.github.com/1102519
With kind regards,
Matthias Siewert
Ps: Note for everyone using validator.nu, if you get the following error:
IO Error: Non-XML Content-Type: text/x-csl.
Try text field instead of file upload. (coulnd't find anything regarding this in the forum yet.)
I've changed style-name and ID to earth-surface-processes-and-landforms
we've come to prefer more content rich IDs except for the best known styles - this isn't documented yet so no way you could have known, I'm just letting you know so you understand the changes I've made (I also deleted a couple of redundant lines, mostly options that were set to their default value.
It can be installed and works well, but I am afraid to tell you, that it would not gernerate a preview in the repository.
MS