Dictionary entry
Hi there,
I seem to be having difficulty with my Chicago style dictionary entries.
As far as I know they should appear as:
Oxford Dictionaries, s.v. “trouser role,” accessed January 1, 2018, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/trouser-role.
But instead they appear in word as:
“Trouser Role.” n.d. English Oxford Living Dictionaries. Accessed January 1, 2018. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/trouser_role.
What am I doing wrong? My thesis is due soon and I have tried everything!
I'm using Firefox and as far as I know the latest Zotero.
Regards
Ane
I seem to be having difficulty with my Chicago style dictionary entries.
As far as I know they should appear as:
Oxford Dictionaries, s.v. “trouser role,” accessed January 1, 2018, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/trouser-role.
But instead they appear in word as:
“Trouser Role.” n.d. English Oxford Living Dictionaries. Accessed January 1, 2018. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/trouser_role.
What am I doing wrong? My thesis is due soon and I have tried everything!
I'm using Firefox and as far as I know the latest Zotero.
Regards
Ane
http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed17/part3/ch14/psec232.html
@adamsmith @damnation Should the Chicago styles be adjusted to format entries without named authors correctly?
I don't actually know where we are with this; I think this may already have changed in a recent-ish citeproc version. The CSL Specs are silent on what to do when an item returns an empty string, so this could just be done (if it hasn't already been) via a citeproc change.
Take a look at citations for personal_communication in APA (I think I implemented that rule)
https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/pull/3005
It does not look as if the lines to exclude personal_communication from the bibliography ever made it into the APA file.