Footnote numbering - Chicago 16 style and Microsoft Word 2003

kmtaylor
When I generate footnotes in my Word 2003 documents using Zotero, the numbering differs from what Chicago 16 style guide calls for. They are raised and are missing the period afterwards, instead of being on the same level as the rest of the text with a period. Is there something that I have missed in being able to make the numbers appear correctly in my documents?
  • adamsmith
    formatting of footnote characters is a Word setting (though IIRC one that's surprisingly hard to change). It's not something that Zotero can influence.
    FWIW, Chicago tells you in 14.19 that:
    (In manuscripts, superscripted numbers in both places—the typical default setting in the note-making feature of a word processor—are perfectly acceptable.)

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.