Try this, copy the entry you posted above. Open Zotero, go to the gear menu (the main menu) and select import from clipboard. Does it still have the same problem?
Seems to me, though I could be wrong, that this started when you modified the T2 field in the RIS export file. Now that we can handle the double T2 entries, I would suggest restoring your RIS-EndNote export file to the original, modifying the Book Long Form entry again (since we didn't fix that) and re-exporting.
Alternatively, you can go back to the RIS export style and see if you changed it correctly for Book Chapter. Their styles have a lot of weird characters that may be easily overlooked and I have very little experience in that area, so I would suggest starting from a fresh output style.
Why do you think that it affects the "series title" field being read as part of the name of the series? I had this convoluted scenario in my head and rushed to the conclusions. It may have nothing to do with your modifications. In case you missed my post above, could you post the RIS file you are importing (dropbox or github)?
OK. I see. It seems that in ProCite for that record (and possibly a couple others) the Series Title (32) reads "Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology"
Also, the entry you posted above does not actually correspond to the entry in the file. The one in the "RISbookchaptersonlyUpdate.txt" file reads:
TY - CHAP N1 - 19043 A1 - Brosseder, Ursula T1 - Xiongnu terrace tombs and their interpretation as elite burials N1 - Connective Phrase: In A2 - Bemmann, Jan A2 - Parzinger, Hermann A2 - Pohl, Ernst A2 - Tseveendorzh, Damdinsüren N1 - Author Role: editors T2 - Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia: Papers from the First International Conference on "Archaeological Research in Mongolia"held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th-23rd, 2007 CY - Bonn PB - Bonn University Press PY - 2009 SP - 247-280 T3 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology N1 - Series Volume ID: 4 KW - archaeology KW - mortuary analysis KW - Mongolia KW - empire KW - pastoralism ER -
Not:
TY - CHAP N1 - 19043 A1 - Brosseder, Ursula T1 - Xiongnu terrace tombs and their interpretation as elite burials N1 - Connective Phrase: In A2 - Bemmann, Jan A2 - Parzinger, Hermann A2 - Pohl, Ernst A2 - Tseveendorzh, Damdinsüren N1 - Author Role: editors T2 - Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia: Papers from the First International Conference on "Archaeological Research in Mongolia"held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th-23rd, 2007 CY - Bonn PB - Bonn University Press PY - 2009 SP - 247-280 N1 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology N1 - Series Volume ID: 4 KW - archaeology KW - mortuary analysis KW - Mongolia KW - empire KW - pastoralism ER -
You have a couple options.
Edit the entries in ProCite. This is probably tedious.
Use a text editor that can do search and replace on the exported RIS file to replace T3 - Series Title: (Note the double space after T3) with T3 - (Note the double and single space)
Or we can modify the RIS translator, but since this seems to be a fault with entering data into procite, I don't think it's a good idea.
EDIT: The second code field above reads T3<space><space>-<space>
See actually, I don't think this is actually ProCite's fault, because it ("series title" that is) doesn't appear in the field there, but just when it is exported.
Also you were right about the "T3 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology" I opened up the non-updated file. I did import the T3 version, and it did the "series title" repeat thing.
Does this make a difference? Do I just go and edit the output file?
Sorry, I was talking about updated/not updated as far as my own files. I just had made several exports after the changes you told me to make to the RIS style. So that's not important.
I also downloaded the RIS style from procite.
Not sure why that happened.
If you use the basic RIS from procite, without any modifications to the style, this is what comes out:
TY - CHAP N1 - 19043 A1 - Brosseder, Ursula T2 - Xiongnu terrace tombs and their interpretation as elite burials N1 - Connective Phrase: In A2 - Bemmann, Jan A2 - Parzinger, Hermann A2 - Pohl, Ernst A2 - Tseveendorzh, Damdinsüren N1 - Author Role: editors T2 - Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia: Papers from the First International Conference on "Archaeological Research in Mongolia"held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th-23rd, 2007 CY - Bonn PB - Bonn University Press PY - 2009 SP - 247-280 N1 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology N1 - Series Volume ID: 4 KW - archaeology KW - mortuary analysis KW - Mongolia KW - empire KW - pastoralism ER -
If modified, it was as above with the T3 field etc...
I'm not sure how that modification happened. I recommend using the original (i.e. from ProCite) RIS export style file and only modify the TY field for Book Long Form from CHAP to BOOK. I believe everything else should work properly.
series title should be T3, but wait for Aurimas - he may want to change this in the translator instead.
I tried this to see if it would work, so I think that's how. I also had changed it before when you all told me to, so there were several changes. But you think its coded well enough now to use only the original style then, other than CHAP to BOOK?
Thanks, I will try this on Monday when I am back at work.
Well I tried Book Long Form again, and was looking through some entries. Many look good, but I found an entry with both a section or article title, with a book title, and a series title.
It looks like these kinds of "book long form" entries would be better off being imported as chapters? Should I actually change CHAP to BOOK?
TY - BOOK N1 - Record ID: 86 A1 - Baerreis, David A. T1 - A Quantitative Approach to Culture Change: The Delaware Indians as an Ethnohistoric Case Study. N1 - Connective Phrase: In A2 - Dunnell, Robert C. A2 - Grayson, Donald K. N1 - Author Role: edited by T2 - Lulu Linear Punctated: Essays in Honor of George Irving Quimby CY - Ann Arbor PB - Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan PY - 1983 SP - 185-207 T3 - Anthropological Papers N1 - Series Volume ID: No. 72 N1 - Notes: seen KW - ethnohistory KW - historic archaeology KW - Dissertation ER -
Error: Generic workform, no workform chosen (low priority)
this is low priority, but on a generic record with no workform chosen, the N1 field did not import as notes or anywhere else. The original field was "Packaging Method (27):" Extent of work also did not transfer. Finally, the AV field below for availability, did transfer to notes, but should probably be mapped to Archive in Zotero, or Extra.
TY - GEN N1 - Record ID: 157 A1 - Bear, Stella T1 - Arikara Creation Myth A2 - Sloan, Elizabeth C. N1 - Author Role: Collected by PY - n.d. N1 - Extent of Work: 2 N1 - Packaging Method: pages, handwritten AV - National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. UR - Ms. on file N1 - Notes: May have been published in JAFL, date unknown KW - Arikara KW - ethnohistory ER -
Conference Proceedings are also not transferring exactly right. Bolded fields (see below) were left out, or transferred incorrectly. "Date of Meeting" (Y2 below), should probably be mapped to notes, as there is no spot for meeting date, in addition to publication date of the proceedings in Zotero. Place of meeting should probably be transferred to Place instead of the CY field being put there, as the CY field is supposed to indicate where it was published. Since "Place" in zotero is directly under Conference Name, I imagine they want the place of the conference there, not where the proceedings were published. Finally, Editors were mapped as contributors (editor/compliler field #7 in ProCite).
TY - CONF N1 - Record Number: 320 A1 - Barfield, Thomas J. T1 - Political centralization on the Mongolian steppe: dueling models of the past N1 - Connective Phrase: In A2 - Hanks, Bryan A2 - Linduff, Kathy N1 - Proceedings Title: New Research Directions in Eurasian Steppe Archaeology: The Emergence of Complex Societies in the Third to First Millennia BCE Y2 - 2006/02/10-2006/02/10 N1 - Place of Meeting: University of Pittsburgh CY - Pittsburgh PB - Department of Anthropology & Center for Russian and East European Studies PY - 2006 KW - Mongolia KW - political organization KW - pastoralism ER -
TY - CONF N1 - Record Number: 257 A1 - Bender, Barbara T1 - Middle Rangers' in Prehistory N1 - Connective Phrase: Paper presented at the A2 - Upham, Steadman N1 - Editor/Compiler Role: Chairperson N1 - Proceedings Title: The Development of Political Systems in Prehistoric Sedentary Societies Advanced Seminar N1 - Place of Meeting: School of American Research CY - Santa Fe PY - 1987 N1 - Notes: have, seen KW - culture change KW - chiefdoms ER -
Thanks again Aurimas... Sorry for all of the tedious errors.
Another very low priority one is mapping version to computer program type. We have almost none of these, so its not so important for this database, but might be for someone else in the future: TY - COMP N1 - Record Number: 4103 T1 - OxCal v3.9 A1 - Bronk Ramsey, Christopher IS - 3.9 CY - Oxford, England PB - Research Laboratory for Archaeology, Oxford University PY - 2002 N1 - Date of Copyright: 2002 N1 - Notes: have, seen KW - C-14 KW - method KW - statistics ER -
As I mentioned previously, there is some functionality missing in Zotero with reports. There is no "Editor" only "Series Editor", which makes the "creator" field in the list view look blank, because series editor is not listed there.
Therefore this isn't so much an error, as something that doesn't fit... but Author Role is not mapping correctly. Presumably because there is no editor, only series editor. I do think that this is something Zotero overall should change though, if possible. What do you think? Otherwise, at worst, the Author role field should be copied to notes in this case to let the user know that these authors are really editors..
TY - RPRT N1 - Record Number: 2926 A1 - Ahler, Stanley A. A1 - Toom, Dennis L. N1 - Author Role, Analytic: editors T1 - Archeology of the Medicine Crow Site Complex (39BF2), Buffalo County, South Dakota CY - Denver, CO PB - Branch of Interagency Archeological Services, U.S. National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Office PY - 1989 VL - A report prepared in partial fulfillment of Contract No. CX 1200-6-3547 (originally Contract No. CX 1595-6-0010) by Illinois State Museum Society for the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, U.S. National Park Service N1 - Notes: DR's KW - Arikara archaeology KW - Medicine Crow ER -
TY - RPRT N1 - Record Number: 13663 A1 - Cooper, Louise N1 - Connective Phrase: in T1 - Wealth and Poverty in the Mongolian Pastoral Economy CY - University of Sussex: Institute of Development Studies PY - 1995 T3 - PALD Research Report N1 - Series Issue ID: No. II KW - Mongolia KW - pastoralism ER -
TY - SER N1 - Record Number: 5833 A1 - Flynn, Gillian T1 - Portraying Difficult and Controversial Subjects PY - December 18, 2000 N1 - Notes: have KW - museum studies ER -
Extent of work is also not mapping
TY - SER N1 - Record Number: 20353 A1 - Dickson, Michael A1 - Littleton, Judith A1 - Frohlich, Bruno A1 - Amgalantögs, Tsend A1 - Karstens, Sarah A1 - Floyd, Bruce N1 - Author Role: Authors T1 - How many bodies makes a burial? Mongolian khirigsuurs and burials RP - In File N1 - Extent of Work: 30 N1 - Notes: have pdf N2 - One of the difficulties dealing with burials and with human remains in general is how to interpret their absence. Kirigsuurs are the distinctive built stone mounds of the late Bronze Age/early Iron Age in the Mongolian steppe and Baikal region of Siberia (Cybiktarov 2003). Their monumentality attracts archaeological interest and consequently produces a range of interpretations (Allard & Erdenebaatar 2005, Honeychurch et al. 2009, Houle 2010). One of the central points of dispute is whether these structures are burials. The debate about khirigsuurs is reminiscent of other debates surrounding graves without burials (e.g. Bethell & Carver 1987; Littleton 1995). Our aim in this paper is to argue that khirigsuurs are indeed primarily burials, that in controlled and detailed excavations taphonomic processes account for the absent human remains, and that interpretations about their symbolic role need to take this primary function as a starting point rather than as an incidental possibility. KW - Mongolia KW - Bronze Age KW - mortuary analysis ER -
"Address/Availability (37):" field in ProCite is going into notes. Should be mapped into either Extra or Archive in Zotero.
It looks like these kinds of "book long form" entries would be better off being imported as chapters? Should I actually change CHAP to BOOK?
is there anything to help us get around which are actually books vs. which are chapters/articles within books within series?
I'm going to try and make the translator figure out if book or chapter is more appropriate. Don't hold your breath though. The problem is that I need to make sure this doesn't break anything with regular RIS files that have not been exported from ProCite.
on a generic record with no workform chosen, the N1 field did not import as notes or anywhere else. The original field was "Packaging Method (27):" Extent of work also did not transfer.
Packaging Method and Extent of Work for that record were placed in the Number of Pages field, but Journal Article (the default type for GEN record) does not have that field, so it was dropped. I will add some checking to make sure that fields are never dropped.
Finally, the AV field below for availability, did transfer to notes, but should probably be mapped to Archive in Zotero, or Extra.
AV is not technically part of the RIS specification. This is ProCite specific. While we can be a little lenient and accommodate this, I wonder if this may conflict with AV field used for a different purpose somewhere else. I'll need to take a look at ProCite more closely to make sure that it's at least consistent within their software before I make this change.
Conference Proceedings are also not transferring exactly right. Bolded fields (see below) were left out, or transferred incorrectly. "Date of Meeting" (Y2 below), should probably be mapped to notes, as there is no spot for meeting date, in addition to publication date of the proceedings in Zotero. Place of meeting should probably be transferred to Place instead of the CY field being put there, as the CY field is supposed to indicate where it was published. Since "Place" in zotero is directly under Conference Name, I imagine they want the place of the conference there, not where the proceedings were published.
Finally, Editors were mapped as contributors (editor/compliler field #7 in ProCite).
I can try to improve the author role algorithm, but because we have to cover a lot of generic cases, I can't promise that this will always map correctly. In this case, it probably should though.
Conference Proceedings seems to have some serious problems mapping:
Are you referring here to the same problems as above?
Sorry for all of the tedious errors.
On the contrary, these reports are great. There's no way I have time to go through this many records and figure out where our algorithm will go wrong. Thanks for all your work.
mapping version to computer program type
IS - 3.9
This is rather annoying. Program version should be represented with the ET field. This is an error in the export style. I'll accommodate this, but now I have to do extra checking to make sure we don't overwrite actual version.
As I mentioned previously, there is some functionality missing in Zotero with reports. There is no "Editor" only "Series Editor", which makes the "creator" field in the list view look blank, because series editor is not listed there.
Therefore this isn't so much an error, as something that doesn't fit... but Author Role is not mapping correctly. Presumably because there is no editor, only series editor. I do think that this is something Zotero overall should change though, if possible. What do you think? Otherwise, at worst, the Author role field should be copied to notes in this case to let the user know that these authors are really editors..
I'm not an expert on reports, but perhaps there's a good reason there is no editor. I would post this in a new thread and someone with better knowledge of how this is handled will hopefully answer you.
Error in transferring series title and series ID.
The former appears to be a slight inconsistency within Zotero (investigating) and the latter is an inconsistency in ProCite (I'll fix that)
Error: Manuscripts are mapping as books TY - SER
SER stands for serial (though I guess ProCite uses it for manuscript). Zotero doesn't have a way to represent a serial publication in and of its, so I think book is a decent mapping. What is the Workform for these records in ProCite?
Extent of work is also not mapping ..... RP - In File N1 - Extent of Work: 30 N1 - Notes: have pdf
The unit for the extent is not indicated, so we can't be sure that this is pages and not volumes. Though for serial, this is likely pages. I don't think it's worth the risk to try and figure it out.
Upgrade Storage
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/zoteroseriestitleerror.png
Does that help? See how "Series Title" is repeated as words in Zotero?
Problem is there are multiple files like that, so I would have to find every one with a series and cull them out of the large RIS file. :/
Wonder why is does it like that?
Alternatively, you can go back to the RIS export style and see if you changed it correctly for Book Chapter. Their styles have a lot of weird characters that may be easily overlooked and I have very little experience in that area, so I would suggest starting from a fresh output style.
The entry you posted above, is that from the same file you are trying to import? If yes, then hold on with the changes I suggested above.
EDIT: post the file you are importing on dropbox or github
So change Book Long Form back to Chap and the first author back to T2, from T1?
Why do you think that it affects the "series title" field being read as part of the name of the series?
This is what my RIS field currently has:
Book Chapter:
TY - CHAP|
N1 - |
A1 - <01 Author, Analytic>|
T1 - <04 Title, Analytic>|
N1 - Medium Designator: <05 Medium Designator>|
N1 - Connective Phrase: <06 Connective Phrase>|
A2 - <07 Author, Monographic>|
N1 - Author Role: <08 Author Role>|
T2 - <09 Title, Monographic>|
RP - <12 Reprint Status>|
VL - <15 Edition>|
CY - <18 Place of Publication>|
PB - <19 Publisher Name>|
PY - <20 Date of Publication>|
N1 - Volume ID: <22 Volume ID>|
N1 - Issue ID: <24 Issue ID>|
SP - <25 Page(s)>|
A3 - <30 Series Editor>|
N1 - Series Editor Role: <31 Series Editor Role>|
T3 - Series Title: <32 Series Title>|
N1 - Series Volume ID: <33 Series Volume Identification>|
N1 - Series Issue ID: <34 Series Issue Identification>|
N1 - Connective Phrase<36 Connective Phrase>|
AV - <37 Address/Availability>|
UR - <38 Location/URL>|
N1 - Notes: <42 Notes>|
N2 - <43 Abstract>|
N1 - Call Number: <44 Call Number>|
KW - <45 Keywords>|
ER -
Book Long Form
TY - BOOK|
N1 - Record ID: |
A1 - <01 Author, Analytic>|
N1 - Author Role: <02 Author Role>|
T1 - <04 Title, Analytic>|
N1 - Medium Designator: <05 Medium Designator>|
N1 - Connective Phrase: <06 Connective Phrase>|
A2 - <07 Author, Monographic>|
N1 - Author Role: <08 Author Role>|
T2 - <09 Title, Monographic>|
RP - <12 Reprint Status>|
VL - <15 Edition>|
N1 - Author, Subsidiary: <16 Author, Subsidiary>|
N1 - Author Role: <17 Author Role>|
CY - <18 Place of Publication>|
PB - <19 Publisher Name>|
PY - <20 Date of Publication>|
N1 - Date of Copyright: <21 Date of Copyright>|
N1 - Volume ID: <22 Volume ID>|
N1 - Issue ID: <24 Issue ID>|
SP - <25 Page(s)>|
N1 - Extent of Work: <26 Extent of Work>|
N1 - Packaging Method: <27 Packaging Method>|
A3 - <30 Series Editor>|
N1 - Series Editor Role: <31 Series Editor Role>|
T3 - <32 Series Title>|
N1 - Series Volume ID: <33 Series Volume ID>|
AV - <37 Address/Availability>|
UR - <38 Location/URL>|
SN - <41 ISBN>|
N1 - Notes: <42 Notes>|
N2 - <43 Abstract>|
N1 - Call Number: <44 Call Number>|
KW - <45 Keywords>|
ER -
I had this convoluted scenario in my head and rushed to the conclusions. It may have nothing to do with your modifications. In case you missed my post above, could you post the RIS file you are importing (dropbox or github)?
Book Chapters only
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/RISbookchaptersonlyUpdate.txt
Book Long Form only
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/RISbooklongform_update.txt
Also, the entry you posted above does not actually correspond to the entry in the file. The one in the "RISbookchaptersonlyUpdate.txt" file reads:
TY - CHAP
N1 - 19043
A1 - Brosseder, Ursula
T1 - Xiongnu terrace tombs and their interpretation as elite burials
N1 - Connective Phrase: In
A2 - Bemmann, Jan
A2 - Parzinger, Hermann
A2 - Pohl, Ernst
A2 - Tseveendorzh, Damdinsüren
N1 - Author Role: editors
T2 - Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia: Papers from the First International Conference on "Archaeological Research in Mongolia"held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th-23rd, 2007
CY - Bonn
PB - Bonn University Press
PY - 2009
SP - 247-280
T3 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology
N1 - Series Volume ID: 4
KW - archaeology
KW - mortuary analysis
KW - Mongolia
KW - empire
KW - pastoralism
ER -
Not:
TY - CHAP
N1 - 19043
A1 - Brosseder, Ursula
T1 - Xiongnu terrace tombs and their interpretation as elite burials
N1 - Connective Phrase: In
A2 - Bemmann, Jan
A2 - Parzinger, Hermann
A2 - Pohl, Ernst
A2 - Tseveendorzh, Damdinsüren
N1 - Author Role: editors
T2 - Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia: Papers from the First International Conference on "Archaeological Research in Mongolia"held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th-23rd, 2007
CY - Bonn
PB - Bonn University Press
PY - 2009
SP - 247-280
N1 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology
N1 - Series Volume ID: 4
KW - archaeology
KW - mortuary analysis
KW - Mongolia
KW - empire
KW - pastoralism
ER -
You have a couple options.
Edit the entries in ProCite. This is probably tedious.
Use a text editor that can do search and replace on the exported RIS file to replace
T3 - Series Title:(Note the double space after T3) withT3 -(Note the double and single space)Or we can modify the RIS translator, but since this seems to be a fault with entering data into procite, I don't think it's a good idea.
EDIT: The second code field above reads
T3<space><space>-<space>#32 BEGINS WITH "Series Title:"See this screenshot: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/brosseder series title example.png
Also you were right about the "T3 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology" I opened up the non-updated file. I did import the T3 version, and it did the "series title" repeat thing.
Does this make a difference? Do I just go and edit the output file?
EDIT: The only thing any of this makes sense is if your RIS style is messed up. I got mine from http://www.procite.com/support/pcsupport.asp under bibliographic output style.
I also downloaded the RIS style from procite.
Not sure why that happened.
If you use the basic RIS from procite, without any modifications to the style, this is what comes out:
TY - CHAP
N1 - 19043
A1 - Brosseder, Ursula
T2 - Xiongnu terrace tombs and their interpretation as elite burials
N1 - Connective Phrase: In
A2 - Bemmann, Jan
A2 - Parzinger, Hermann
A2 - Pohl, Ernst
A2 - Tseveendorzh, Damdinsüren
N1 - Author Role: editors
T2 - Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia: Papers from the First International Conference on "Archaeological Research in Mongolia"held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th-23rd, 2007
CY - Bonn
PB - Bonn University Press
PY - 2009
SP - 247-280
N1 - Series Title: Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology
N1 - Series Volume ID: 4
KW - archaeology
KW - mortuary analysis
KW - Mongolia
KW - empire
KW - pastoralism
ER -
If modified, it was as above with the T3 field etc...
Thanks, I will try this on Monday when I am back at work.
So to confirm before I reload it all again:
1. I downloaded a fresh copy of RIS-Endnote for Procite, and the only thing I needed to change was Book Long Form from CHAP to BOOK.
That should fix the series title problem and everything else should import correctly?
Thanks. :)
Well I tried Book Long Form again, and was looking through some entries. Many look good, but I found an entry with both a section or article title, with a book title, and a series title.
It looks like these kinds of "book long form" entries would be better off being imported as chapters? Should I actually change CHAP to BOOK?
Record in Procite
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/booklongformerror_section_title_series.png
Record in Zotero: (note that series title was not preserved in notes either)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/booklongformerror_section_title_series_zotero.png
This is the record with CHAP changed to BOOK
TY - BOOK
N1 - Record ID: 86
A1 - Baerreis, David A.
T1 - A Quantitative Approach to Culture Change: The Delaware Indians as an Ethnohistoric Case Study.
N1 - Connective Phrase: In
A2 - Dunnell, Robert C.
A2 - Grayson, Donald K.
N1 - Author Role: edited by
T2 - Lulu Linear Punctated: Essays in Honor of George Irving Quimby
CY - Ann Arbor
PB - Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan
PY - 1983
SP - 185-207
T3 - Anthropological Papers
N1 - Series Volume ID: No. 72
N1 - Notes: seen
KW - ethnohistory
KW - historic archaeology
KW - Dissertation
ER -
is there anything to help us get around which are actually books vs. which are chapters/articles within books within series?
this is low priority, but on a generic record with no workform chosen, the N1 field did not import as notes or anywhere else. The original field was "Packaging Method (27):" Extent of work also did not transfer. Finally, the AV field below for availability, did transfer to notes, but should probably be mapped to Archive in Zotero, or Extra.
TY - GEN
N1 - Record ID: 157
A1 - Bear, Stella
T1 - Arikara Creation Myth
A2 - Sloan, Elizabeth C.
N1 - Author Role: Collected by
PY - n.d.
N1 - Extent of Work: 2
N1 - Packaging Method: pages, handwritten
AV - National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
UR - Ms. on file
N1 - Notes: May have been published in JAFL, date unknown
KW - Arikara
KW - ethnohistory
ER -
in procite:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/error_conferenceproceeding.png
in zotero:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/error_conferenceproceeding_zot.png
TY - CONF
N1 - Record Number: 320
A1 - Barfield, Thomas J.
T1 - Political centralization on the Mongolian steppe: dueling models of the past
N1 - Connective Phrase: In
A2 - Hanks, Bryan
A2 - Linduff, Kathy
N1 - Proceedings Title: New Research Directions in Eurasian Steppe Archaeology: The Emergence of Complex Societies in the Third to First Millennia BCE
Y2 - 2006/02/10-2006/02/10
N1 - Place of Meeting: University of Pittsburgh
CY - Pittsburgh
PB - Department of Anthropology & Center for Russian and East European Studies
PY - 2006
KW - Mongolia
KW - political organization
KW - pastoralism
ER -
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/error_conf_proceeeding_ex2.png
[edit wrong link before] http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/error_conf_proceeeding_ex2_zot.png
TY - CONF
N1 - Record Number: 257
A1 - Bender, Barbara
T1 - Middle Rangers' in Prehistory
N1 - Connective Phrase: Paper presented at the
A2 - Upham, Steadman
N1 - Editor/Compiler Role: Chairperson
N1 - Proceedings Title: The Development of Political Systems in Prehistoric Sedentary Societies Advanced Seminar
N1 - Place of Meeting: School of American Research
CY - Santa Fe
PY - 1987
N1 - Notes: have, seen
KW - culture change
KW - chiefdoms
ER -
Thanks again Aurimas... Sorry for all of the tedious errors.
Another very low priority one is mapping version to computer program type. We have almost none of these, so its not so important for this database, but might be for someone else in the future:
TY - COMP
N1 - Record Number: 4103
T1 - OxCal v3.9
A1 - Bronk Ramsey, Christopher
IS - 3.9
CY - Oxford, England
PB - Research Laboratory for Archaeology, Oxford University
PY - 2002
N1 - Date of Copyright: 2002
N1 - Notes: have, seen
KW - C-14
KW - method
KW - statistics
ER -
As I mentioned previously, there is some functionality missing in Zotero with reports. There is no "Editor" only "Series Editor", which makes the "creator" field in the list view look blank, because series editor is not listed there.
Therefore this isn't so much an error, as something that doesn't fit... but Author Role is not mapping correctly. Presumably because there is no editor, only series editor. I do think that this is something Zotero overall should change though, if possible. What do you think? Otherwise, at worst, the Author role field should be copied to notes in this case to let the user know that these authors are really editors..
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/report_error_zot.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/report_error.png
TY - RPRT
N1 - Record Number: 2926
A1 - Ahler, Stanley A.
A1 - Toom, Dennis L.
N1 - Author Role, Analytic: editors
T1 - Archeology of the Medicine Crow Site Complex (39BF2), Buffalo County, South Dakota
CY - Denver, CO
PB - Branch of Interagency Archeological Services, U.S. National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Office
PY - 1989
VL - A report prepared in partial fulfillment of Contract No. CX 1200-6-3547 (originally Contract No. CX 1595-6-0010) by Illinois State Museum Society for the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, U.S. National Park Service
N1 - Notes: DR's
KW - Arikara archaeology
KW - Medicine Crow
ER -
Error in transferring series title and series ID.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/report_error.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19141190/error_report_seriestitleandID.png
TY - RPRT
N1 - Record Number: 13663
A1 - Cooper, Louise
N1 - Connective Phrase: in
T1 - Wealth and Poverty in the Mongolian Pastoral Economy
CY - University of Sussex: Institute of Development Studies
PY - 1995
T3 - PALD Research Report
N1 - Series Issue ID: No. II
KW - Mongolia
KW - pastoralism
ER -
TY - SER
N1 - Record Number: 5833
A1 - Flynn, Gillian
T1 - Portraying Difficult and Controversial Subjects
PY - December 18, 2000
N1 - Notes: have
KW - museum studies
ER -
Extent of work is also not mapping
TY - SER
N1 - Record Number: 20353
A1 - Dickson, Michael
A1 - Littleton, Judith
A1 - Frohlich, Bruno
A1 - Amgalantögs, Tsend
A1 - Karstens, Sarah
A1 - Floyd, Bruce
N1 - Author Role: Authors
T1 - How many bodies makes a burial? Mongolian khirigsuurs and burials
RP - In File
N1 - Extent of Work: 30
N1 - Notes: have pdf
N2 - One of the difficulties dealing with burials and with human remains in general is how to interpret their absence. Kirigsuurs are the distinctive built stone mounds of the late Bronze Age/early Iron Age in the Mongolian steppe and Baikal region of Siberia (Cybiktarov 2003). Their monumentality attracts archaeological interest and consequently produces a range of interpretations (Allard & Erdenebaatar 2005, Honeychurch et al. 2009, Houle 2010). One of the central points of dispute is whether these structures are burials. The debate about khirigsuurs is reminiscent of other debates surrounding graves without burials (e.g. Bethell & Carver 1987; Littleton 1995). Our aim in this paper is to argue that khirigsuurs are indeed primarily burials, that in controlled and detailed excavations taphonomic processes account for the absent human remains, and that interpretations about their symbolic role need to take this primary function as a starting point rather than as an incidental possibility.
KW - Mongolia
KW - Bronze Age
KW - mortuary analysis
ER -
"Address/Availability (37):" field in ProCite is going into notes. Should be mapped into either Extra or Archive in Zotero.