Comments

• Any updates on this? Would be very nice to have this asap!

  in Export the entries in the Related tab Comment by benjaminlrobinson October 6, 2023
• So adamsmith - whats the way forward here?

  in Citation Style for Energy Research & Social Science is wrong! Comment by benjaminlrobinson December 15, 2022
• Yeah, according the the editor in chief of the journal [1-3] is not correct. And with four references it would be [1,2,3,6] and 10 [1,3,4,6,7,8,9,11,33,40]. And just to clarify the style is only incorrect with consecutive refs so [1-3], when stackin…

  in Citation Style for Energy Research & Social Science is wrong! Comment by benjaminlrobinson December 14, 2022
• From reading through a load of articles looks like people use the IEEE style as the ERSS one doesn't match the journal guidelines and the IEEE is closer-ish...

  in Citation Style for Energy Research & Social Science is wrong! Comment by benjaminlrobinson December 13, 2022
• A note to me from their editor in chief: "The journal is using a numeric reference style. References must be cited by numbers running consecutively in the text, e.g., ".. some studies have examined the influence of participation [1,2,3]" or "As Daw…

  in Citation Style for Energy Research & Social Science is wrong! Comment by benjaminlrobinson December 13, 2022