Comments

• Brief update. In the style, the line should be

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik December 15, 2009
• Thanks AdamSmith! It appears to be working for us now. Over the next couple of weeks, we will be using it to build our bibliography, and will let you know of any problems. Thanks for all the help on this project in particular, it will be a huge t…

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik November 16, 2009
• 2.0b7.4 is the version we are using

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik November 12, 2009
• No luck, I even tried deleting it completely before re-install.

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik November 12, 2009
• I tried it on 3 different computers here in our labs, 2 macs and 1 PC (all running firefox), same problem. Also noticed that if you click "edit citation" and click cancel it tends to renumber the citations (differently, but again incorrectly)

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik November 12, 2009
• Hi Adam, We haven't found any stylistic bugs in the first pass, but there is a strange bug with this style numbering in reverse order. But, if I flip to another style (such as IEEE) and then back to your annual review style it is correct. On t…

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik November 12, 2009
• Thank you again for your help Adamsmith. Your efforts will help many of us that are submitting manuscripts for the Annual Review family of journals.

  in CSL Request: Annual Reviews of Materials Research Comment by blaiszik November 9, 2009