Comments

• @fbennett: You're right, that line is still there. If that solves it I'm happy - I just hope there are no other effects... @adamsmith: I agree - this behaviour doesn't disambiguate anything, and the "b"-suffix does the job.

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 31, 2011
• It seems that 2.1.2 has corrected all the issues I've described before, so that's awesome!! However, I found one additional issue just now which wasn't corrected. A couple of citations are not minimzed anymore, and I have no idea why: was: (Berns e…

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 31, 2011
• @fbennett: Sorry, didn't see it until today. Here you go: https://gist.github.com/892422 The problem persists with other styles, though (maybe some issue with my local machine?!). This is the Bibliography output of "Chicago Manual of Style (…

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 29, 2011
• @fbennett: I really think the problem lies elsewhere ... I've just created a new Word doc with the original Harvard Reference format 1 style with 5 test entries. This was the result: Citations: (aaa 2011) (Aaa 2011) (zzz 2011) (ZZZ 2011) (AAZ…

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 28, 2011
• @ adamsmith: great! then I'll delay my nervous breakdown and hope for 2.1.2...

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 28, 2011
• ok. I haven't changed the style for quite some time, though, and the sorting issue does not show in my word file from Sunday (before I upgraded). Actually, I am more worried about the undone manual edits of the in-text citations - they'd take a…

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 28, 2011
• "undone all my manual changes to citations" ...by this I mean that all manual edits that I made via "Show Editor..." are lost now, is that correct? Would be a nightmare... With respect to "ABC 2011" comes before "Aaa 2011": Are you refering to this…

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 28, 2011
• Thanks for the prompt answer! Meanwhile I noticed another issue regarding dates: If the "Date" field in the database contains something other than the year there are problems as well. For instance, the citation becomes "(Zipkin Spring)" ins…

  in Wrong representation of date of access, sorting issue in bibliography Comment by verano March 28, 2011