Comments

• Hi, @adamsmith I've just noticed two tiny problems when citing legislation. 1) When 'ibid' is used because the reference is repeated, the section number is not preceded by 's' or 'ss' and I think it should be as it's a section number not a page nu…

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 August 1, 2019
• Hi, I've just noticed two tiny problems when citing legislation. 1) When 'ibid' is used because the reference is repeated, the section number is not preceded by 's' or 'ss' and I think it should be as it's a section number not a page number. It l…

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 May 23, 2019
• @adamsmith Thank you so much.

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 November 28, 2018
• I've been struggling with that too. It happens with the section numbers of statutes as well, not just cases - when you cite the statute the second time, it just puts the cross reference (n1) without the section number, even if you've entered the sec…

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 October 30, 2018
• @adamsmith Just checking back in to see if it was possible to make the correction we discussed last year regarding cross referencing of statutes? Mine is still cross referencing statutes even though OSCOLA says not to. It wouldn't matter except …

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 September 4, 2018
• Thank you so much. It's pg 6 of the guide at the top of the page. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxlaw/oscola_4th_edn_hart_2012.pdf 'EXAMPLE of subsequent citation of legislation This example shows legislation for which a short form could b…

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 May 12, 2017
• Hi, I'm so grateful for the OSCOLA style with zotero - it's amazing! It might be that I'm doing something wrong but I'm having difficulty with citing sections of statutes. The first time the act is cited it works perfectly (I insert the statute a…

  in Style Request: Oscola Comment by sem68 May 12, 2017