procrastinator
About
- Username
- procrastinator
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Because of the upcoming v7, I recently had another look at my corrupted entries. They are mostly still present, and I’ve not found any really good way of correcting them. If I re-add the PubMed entry, I get a separate citation that I have to merge w…
-
No, not the faultily imported ones. Only my recent additions have that. The Extra field in my bad items contain "Type: JournalArticle" instead. I only have the PMID number in a notes field along woth the month of publication as I showed above.
-
Thanks for looking into this. I have misremembered, because I have now found a citavi file (cv5) dated May 3rd 2020, and importing from its BAK-file as detailed elsewhere on this site, I get similarly badly formatted results. Setting aside the def…
-
I am positive the corrupt ones used to be PubMed entries, and that that's where the notes containing e.g. "nov, PubMed ID: xxxxxxxx" come from. The newly correct entries have "PubMed". Most of the corrupted entries have a blank library catalogue fi…
-
... well, my question wasn't exactly meant as a feature request. It was merely a question to fellow Zotfile-users if anyone had found themselves a good way of tracking and citing secondary assertations (not citations) found in their sources. In my…
-
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll upgrade, eventually, of course, but apart from adding the visual colour clue to my notes, I don't really see that the new viewer and annotation options would facilitate my request for marking up a citation as secondar…