Upgrade Storageilyagoldin
About
- Username
- ilyagoldin
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Right, a paper that is "under review" is newer than a paper that's already been published.
-
Thanks, that's a huge improvement. But non-numeric "dates" are always sorted last in reverse chronological order, so if date is missing (i.e., is displayed as n.d.), or if it's "accepted" or "under review" or "in press", then the publication is sort…
-
There's already an APA style that's an option on the CV page, but it doesn't sort in reverse chronological order.
-
Here's an APA 6th style that's sorted in reverse chronological order: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5085947 Could you upload that as a server-side option for the CV renderer? The only change from APA 6th is really
-
Pinging the developers once again. Please see the above 2 comments. Thanks in advance.
-
Above, the forum software ate the "nbsp" entity under the item "IEEE needs..."
-
Progress! Style changes now work, and non-numeric dates now display. Remaining issues, some cosmetic, some functional: - URL and DOI metadata should be encoded as hyperlinks, not text - All styles have unnecessary left indentation. …
-
@adamsmith - in a Word document, the bibliography generated via the plugin does display "accepted" as a date. I haven't tested sort order in a doc. @fcheslak - well, you certainly tweaked something. Now I get "An error occurred" in every sectio…
-
Actually, it seems the formatting does not obey the style chosen. I get exactly the same formatting for IEEE, APA, and NLM. As to 1, my true CV consists of both published and not-yet-published works. (Just as it's acceptable to cite not-yet-pub…
-
Just a ping. Any comments from the developers? Thanks in advance.