Comments

• Thanks for the assistance and information! Sorry for not realising. I spent a solid 5 hours searching through info before i left a message on the forum today to try and avoid that happening! The publication is now formatted correctly! Many thanks.

  in National library of medicine in alphabetical order Comment by scocking January 26, 2017
• Yes, correct. It is simply the order (non-alphabetical) of the bibliography that is the issue. Nothing needs changing to the formatting of the NLM reference itself. I have previously seen @adamsmith use this trick for someone with Vancouver a year…

  in National library of medicine in alphabetical order Comment by scocking January 26, 2017
• http://edmgr.ovid.com/msse/accounts/ifauth.htm Link attached

  in National library of medicine in alphabetical order Comment by scocking January 26, 2017
• Thanks for your response. Website states: "The reference list shall be in alphabetic order (rather than in the order of citation) and numbered. There shall not be more than 40 references for original investigations. Review articles are limited to …

  in National library of medicine in alphabetical order Comment by scocking January 26, 2017