Alan_Bes
About
- Username
- Alan_Bes
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Yes, but with limitations. the system clipboard captures all copied/cut items. This request is for an exclusive internal clipboard that only lists cited references. More importantly though, as far as I know, the systems clipboard cannot be hot-key…
-
Bump ...
-
Thanks Dan. Such a simple feature but without it I'm feeling quite lost!
-
Middle pane colour tags are not working for me either. Windows 10. Firefox 41. ID 1869533409
-
Just tested the Beta and it's all working. Thanks again. Can't believe how something as little as a hotkey can make such a difference.
-
Thanks so much!
-
Just tested from my laptop which is also running Windows 10. The Crtl-Down doesn't work either. Neither does the CRtl-Alt-A to launch the macro - had to set a new short-cut key As a work around, is there a way to change the short-cut key for t…
-
Yes, the dialogue still opens on mouse left click, it's just the keyboard short cut that is disabled.
-
Thanks for looking into this. Would be great to get a permanent fix as my thesis reference rules require that the subsequent be set to 3.
-
Thanks
-
I edited it and it is now corrected.
-
Here's what I'm getting in Word References in database J Jones 2000 G Jones 2000 A Smith 2000 B Smith 2001 1st instance (Jones 2000) (Jones 2000) (Smith 2000) (Smith 2001) Subsequent instances (Jones, G 2000) (Jones, J 2000) …
-
Thanks I will appreciate that. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/ed22c6bd0ae2f455fd18/download#file-gistfile1-txt
-
I'll start a new thread with the first and subsequent problem with author names
-
Okay, narrowed the problem down to first and subsequent citations - shows correctly for subsequent citations, not first citations
-
Thanks so much. Part of the problem I see is that when I use the default test pane I get different results than when I use the editor at http://editor.citationstyles.org/codeEditor/ Which one should I be using?
-
Thanks, but I'm still not getting the result I'll put the whole line here in case I'm missing out on something If I use the following with your suggestion of "by-cite": I incorrectly get (Jones 2000) and (Jones 2000) If I use givenname-disambig…