Comments

• Now I get the "archive-place" thing, thanks aurimas! (And yes, I was missing something.) Still good news though, it means that I can delete a line of code that I don´t need in the CSL. A third archive field would be a great idea, though. N…

  in Citing archival sources - "from smaller to larger" or reverse - any suggestions for best practice? Comment by torfeur February 16, 2015
• Thanks for your reply! Yes, I read somewhere about the addition of fields for archival use. Any idea if that is likely to be implemented in the next update? I seem to already have the CSL setup as you described. Good news indeed. Just one m…

  in Citing archival sources - "from smaller to larger" or reverse - any suggestions for best practice? Comment by torfeur February 16, 2015