Comments

• I agree it should be "Wright et al., 1992, 1993 and 1994" although that is not specified explicitly in the instructions to authors. This would mirror the behaviour for listing authors so perhaps some of the specification logic used there could b…

  in Help with writing new CSL style Comment by TikkaNZ April 23, 2009
• Re: C) Thanks to Rintze for the news on italicized "et al."s. http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/5584/authors-and-et-al-formatting/#Item_4 Good to know that it is in the works.

  in Help with writing new CSL style Comment by TikkaNZ April 22, 2009
• Great thanks for the update.

  in Authors and et al formatting Comment by TikkaNZ April 22, 2009
• I'm in exactly the same situation. The only thing I've found so far is the following: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/3076/et-al-in-italic-/ ...which suggests that it is not yet possible. :-( I can't find any mention of this in …

  in Authors and et al formatting Comment by TikkaNZ April 22, 2009