Comments

• @bwiernik: "Citavi is unusual in handling them separately." But this makes Citavi very nice to use. @adamsmith: "Again, I agree with the second point -- having chapters better associated with edited volumes would be great" And not only better con…

  in Own media-type for edited volumes Comment by CarWel 12 days ago
• Thanks for your answers. @bwiernik: Unfortunately in my topic, I often have to enter them manually and cannot use the browser-plugin. @adamsmith: In the technical handling, edited volumes may be not very different from books, but bibliographical t…

  in Own media-type for edited volumes Comment by CarWel 18 days ago
• Is there a chance for this to be implemented? That's the last thing, where Citavi has an advantage over Zotero.

  in Own media-type for edited volumes Comment by CarWel 19 days ago
• Thank you for the honest answer. Very sad. Then I have to use something else.

  in Separate fields for title and subtitle Comment by CarWel May 1, 2025
• Are there no plans for this? If it only needs more time, it's OK for me to wait a few months, but if this won't be done, I don't have to wait.

  in Separate fields for title and subtitle Comment by CarWel April 27, 2025
• I was linked to this discussion. I need this feature too. Maybe some people prefer to have only one field for both, title and subtitle. A solution would be to have a toggle like in the author-fields, where you can choose to have separate fields for…

  in Separate fields for title and subtitle Comment by CarWel April 16, 2025
• Thanks for the link. I'll post in that thread...

  in Two separate fields for title and subtitle Comment by CarWel April 16, 2025