Upgrade Storagedtwrublewski
About
- Username
- dtwrublewski
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Gotcha. So to go back to my original question, how does getting rid of the in-text citation disambiguation rules, except for the letters, not conform to this?
-
Oh, ok maybe we were reading it wrong. I looked at it and thought, anytime you have three or more authors, regardless of whether they are the same or not, you are using "et al.", and at no time are you actually listing three or more authors. Are you…
-
We are looking at this now. Personally I think the way AGU has adapted APA is very confusing :(
-
@adamsmith - yes but the first part of my initial comment also said: "For references by three or more authors, abbreviate citation using “et al.” after the first author: (Zhang et al., 2005). Please note, this is a deviation from APA style (which li…
-
@Rintze : I think what AGU is specifying is that for 3 or more authors, you use "et al." from first instance - there's no name disambiguation used at all if you have 3 or more authors. We are currently checking the style details again and will post …
-
Hm. Are you referring to the first or second example? The problem we ran into is when you have six or more identical authors, the a/b/c notation was being superseded by the disambiguate-add-names tag, per http://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/sp…
-
Hi all. Working with a coworker and a patron, I think there is a further correction that needs to be made to this style. We were having a problem with these particular bits of the AGU modification: "For references by three or more authors, abbrevia…
-
Ah - that's it. I know I had changed them in the beginning, but then I was having trouble validating and reverted to an earlier version, and must have gone back to before I edited them. Thanks very much for your help - I will change and hopefully th…
-
:) I think what confused me was even though I didn't have it checked, some of my references did show the URL anyway...
-
THANK YOU! I don't know how I missed that!
-
Absolutely no rush!! Thank you so much!! :)
-
:) No problem, just wanted to make sure I was following (and learning)!
-
Is this referring to a translator for PubMed XML? (Sorry my newbie is showing.)
-
I didn't find that package when I was searching! (It must be Monday...) Thank you so much!!
-
I'm on Mac OSX, 10.12.6. I'm comfortable with basic command line (bash). If there's a way to get it at a command line, that's good enough.
-
Thanks! There's no way to autogenerate it? :)
-
Yes - that works perfectly. Thank you both so much!
-
Hi! Yes, sorry, I updated my comment above with the macro.
-
Sorry - just updated my comment above with the full macro text, and added the code tags.
-
Thank you! Actually, for both the library view and a citation style. The "Date" column gave me what I needed. For my citation style, I am using a custom style, sorting using And then Is there another field I should be usin…
-
Excellent - got it! Thank you again so much!!
-
Right - which is why that needs to be last, and whatever sort you really want needs to be applied first - in my case, year of publication?
-
YES! Thank you so much!!! :)
-
Thank you!!! I just did that - I hope it's viewable now? (I looked at the source code for this page to see how you did it :P ) Thank you again!! :) :) :)
-
:O :O : !!! That worked! Actually, I nuked everything else and added a date sort, as I don't need it sorted by anything else. This did exactly what I needed: I added your code: and then changed the sort: ... And it's…
-
Thanks for your help! It seems that switching between "ascending" and "descending" changes the list by date, but not by number. Here's my code, apologies in advance for the sloppiness - I think I implemented your suggestion properly - apologies if…
-
Thanks! That doesn't seem to be working, but I think I may need to edit a few other things first. I'll keep trying - that definitely sounds like it *should* work! Thank you!
-
Oh no! :( OK - I will make do. This would be a great thing to incorporate! Thanks for your reply and for considering, Donna
-
Gotcha - thanks for the verification and explanation! Cheers!
-
Excellent - thank you! So if I were creating a new style or modifying an old one, that's the bit of XML I'd need to change. Much thanks to you both for your prompt and helpful explanations!