Comments

• Thanks Noksagt for the complement. Crossref has obviously some weight behind it. But the recommandation dates back to 2006!! Anyway, if you, aurimas and the community of users don't have any claim about M3 field, no problem!

  in RIS Import : M3 and "extra" field Comment by eleazardeworms February 26, 2015
• Thank you Aurimas for your Help! Ok whith your statement about Endnote and his "exotic" use of RIS. But the ris specifications (http://www.refman.com/support/direct%20export.zip) are explicite and i definitely not understand the choice of mapping…

  in RIS Import : M3 and "extra" field Comment by eleazardeworms February 25, 2015
• Thank you Aurimas for your answer. So, i have try the hidden preference "trick", but it doesn't work for the journal article type : the m3 data is still missing and no note is created. What wonders me is that in Endnote web, when I import the s…

  in RIS Import : M3 and "extra" field Comment by eleazardeworms February 25, 2015
• Hi, Thank you for your help!! Here is a sample : TY - JOUR AU - DUPONT, Isabelle LA - Français PY - 2006 SP - 233-244 T2 - Bizantinistica TI - L'"école" de traduction des catholicos de Cilicie VL - 8 M3 - Articl…

  in RIS Import : M3 and "extra" field Comment by eleazardeworms February 25, 2015