Upgrade StorageJohn P. McCaskey
About
- Username
- John P. McCaskey
- Joined
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I get the same behavior. 999?passes through as 999? but 1000? comes through as 1000. Also, for my format, I do want c. instead of ?.
-
To the original question: In Word, you can include your citation and mark it as hidden (under Font | Effects). Zotero will still see it and include the corresponding entry in the bibliography. (To see hidden text, go to Options | Display | Always …
-
Maybe the behavior I describe is in fact what is intended and there is simply a bug in citeproc?
-
For this use case, adding , and others as a suffix does not produce the right result. The comma appears outside the quotation mark.
-
Did you mean what I posted at https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/comment/444767 is a citeproc-js bug? or that this is? Where do I post citeproc-js bugs?
-
No other mods. Select three items, open the Style Editor, select CMoS (note), set language to English (US), change to in , and I get delimiting commas outside the closing quotation marks but the suffix period inside.
-
What determines which locale file is active? Why in a , with would a citation with three items be formatted (with CMoS 17) like this: Galen, “My own books”, Fumerton, “Logic”, Grafton, “Ancient Works.” with the delimiter commas outside the quotat…
-
Solved. I don’t know what I was doing wrong, but alt-0160 is now working for me.
-
What about a range that has an opening date but no end date, as when the volumes have not all been published yet? CMOS 17 14.144 says to use an en dash after the first date and gives this example: The Collected Works of Hayek, F. A., edited by Bruce…
-
Thanks!
-
I see. works for code. What’s best for the indented extract? Thanks!
-
@bwiernik, that is the case with conforming and portable CSL. But where is that enforced? Does citeproc really require it? The style editor does not stop me from including in my custom CSL, say, Neither Zotero nor citeproc crash. I assume citepr…
-
My proposal for general key-value pairs wouldn’t offer everything we’d want from a user-interface standpoint, but it would allow us to store values and include them in citations and bibliographies. And I am guessing it would be easy to code in.
-
Is there a good reason the keys in Extra’s key-value pairs must be valid CSL fields? If that limitation were removed, these key-value pairs would effectively be custom fields, and custom CSL could access the keyed values just as it accesses DOI now…
-
FYI @kleerr. This might work for you.
-
Thanks. I used macro="contributors" and that worked. (@adamsmith, what markup do I use to set off code as you did?)
-
It seems that if there were a flag (or I could re-purpose some field as a flag), CSL could wrap the author with [ ] if the flag were true.
-
Thanks @adamsmith. That makes sense. I’ll just change colon to comma or use class="nocase".
-
The proposed icon is the existing sync icon with a slash. It means: remove the ability to sync. The existing chain-link one is “clearer” only if you bring knowledge of it from another application and can mentally extend that here. In Zotero th…