custom item type
Under the Info tab > Item Type I'd like to have an option to define a custom type.
I continually deal with more online publication materials that are not journal articles, are not referenced as a magazine, and are more than just a "web page". So I'd either like to create my own custom Item Type or have one such as "Online Publication".
Thanks.
I continually deal with more online publication materials that are not journal articles, are not referenced as a magazine, and are more than just a "web page". So I'd either like to create my own custom Item Type or have one such as "Online Publication".
Thanks.
And if you need additional fields for those, then add the suggestion to this thread.
http://chromatographyonline.findanalytichem.com/lcgc/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=697438&sk=&date=&pageID=
For me the issue isn't what other category can be used, but rather an accurate record of the item type. That's why I suggested some title like "Web Publication", or allowing to the user to create their own either from start, or by copying an existing item type and editing it.
But it is true, using some other existing category will work.
Endnote has dumb custom fields and types of this sort, and I think it creates as many problems as it solves. The better approach is to have the UI be more flexible so you can encode what you need without having to invent new types.
Any suggestions?
I'll find a way around it - thanks so much for being sooo kind.
Here the APA 6 style says you need to reference a program like this
Comprehensice Meta-Analysis (Version 2) [computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat
But if you use the field Computer program the reference comes out like
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. (2014). (Version 2). Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
Can you change the setting so that i compute with the APA 6 style, can i change the setting?
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
Or
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www .meta-analysis.com/index.html
So I guess if you're missing the authors, we're only short "[Computer software]" part. We'll see what can be done and let you know when this gets fixed.
Also, this is unrelated to the topic, so please follow up in a new thread