Style Error: Academy of Management Review (dev)
First, thanks to whomever is responsible for developing this style.
Second, it contains an error with respect to punctuation following a book or book section. I would fix it but don't know how, so if anyone is able to do so, I (and I'm sure many others) would very much appreciate it.
Currently, it outputs a comma following the book title (for a book) or the page numbers (for a book section). In both cases, the comma should be a period.
Here is an example of what it currently does:
Lant, T. K. 2002. Organizational cognition and interpretation. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Organizations: 344-362, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
And what it should do:
Lant, T. K. 2002. Organizational cognition and interpretation. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Organizations: 344-362. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Thanks very much.
Tom
Second, it contains an error with respect to punctuation following a book or book section. I would fix it but don't know how, so if anyone is able to do so, I (and I'm sure many others) would very much appreciate it.
Currently, it outputs a comma following the book title (for a book) or the page numbers (for a book section). In both cases, the comma should be a period.
Here is an example of what it currently does:
Lant, T. K. 2002. Organizational cognition and interpretation. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Organizations: 344-362, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
And what it should do:
Lant, T. K. 2002. Organizational cognition and interpretation. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Organizations: 344-362. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Thanks very much.
Tom
Best regards,
Tom
Let me know if that did it and please check that I didn't introduce any additional problems.
I also took out the italics for volume numbers, which aren't use in AMR and were a left over from APA.
Cheers,
Tom
First of all thanks for all your work. It's great! :)
Right now I just wanted to ask if this style sheet for AMR is still under development or if there are any known issues associated with it?
Actually I am looking for a style sheet for the AMJ, but as AMJ and AMR use the same style guide, I could also that one for AMR, as long as it works. I am just a little afraid that it might mess up my documents, if it still marked "dev".
What do you think?
Best regards
Thanks a lot. Then I will use this style.
Maybe someone could change the topic of this thread to [SOLVED] yada yada ...
Best regards
I just did that for AMJ (it is as simply as adding this: https://www.zotero.org/svn/csl/dependent/academy-of-management-journal.csl) and AMJ will show up in http://zotero.org/styles soon. Any more aliases that should be added?
It doesn't matter which style someone installs - they're all the same - so the confusion you mention doesn't matter. On the other hand, someone might _not_ know that they're all using the same style. So this should stay the way spaetz made it (thanks!).
Is this a glitch in the add-in, or am I doing something wrong?
The fix is that I click on "Show Editor" and manually make the change in the citation pop-up box, but it would be nice if I didn't have to do that.
Also, I'm wondering if it would make sense to not include the parentheses in the standard insertion of a citation in the body of the text. The reason for this is that sometimes the author's name is used in the text, in which case the parentheses have to be manually edited.
(and don't use show editor - mind the warning displayed when you do)
2. Check "suppress author" when the author is used in the text. Again, don't edit them manually.