Own media-type for edited volumes

edited 12 days ago
Today you have to use the "book"-mediatype for edited volumes and then have to change the author-fields manually to the editor-fields. It would be more comfortable, if edited volumes have their own media-type with editor-fields instead of author-fields, so that you don't have to edit them manually every time. (And adding articles to this edited volume should only have the relevant fields for this article, e.g. article-author(s), article-title, page-numbers.)
  • Is there a chance for this to be implemented?

    That's the last thing, where Citavi has an advantage over Zotero.
  • The most efficient way to add edited volumes and chapters to Zotero is to import them using the Zotero browser connector from the publisher webpage. You should very rarely need to enter any item details like this manually.
  • As for whether this is likely to happen -- the requested feature is almost certainly no for principled reasons: edited volumes are just not very different from books.
    Attaching chapters to books more closely has been much requested and would definitely be nice, but Zotero isn't well set up to add it, so unlikely on the short term at least
  • Thanks for your answers.

    @bwiernik:
    Unfortunately in my topic, I often have to enter them manually and cannot use the browser-plugin.

    @adamsmith:
    In the technical handling, edited volumes may be not very different from books, but bibliographical they are very different. And even if bibliographical standards are ignored, it is not a good usability to change the authors to editors manually for every edited volume. And it is also not good usability, if you have to search the relevant entries for the articles among all the entries that are only relevant for the corresponding edited volume. E.g. I search for the pages-field every time.

    We have to admit, that this is done much more comfortable in Citavi, where edited volumes and the articles in them are handled differently than monographs.
  • Citations of authored and edited volumes are very similar, and nearly every bibliographic data and software system (BibTeX, RIS, CSL, etc) treats them the same. Citavi is unusual in handling them separately.
  • edited 10 days ago
    Again, I agree with the second point -- having chapters better associated with edited volumes would be great (though note that Zotero, when using "Create Book Section" does "relate" the chapter and the book, so they're not entirely disconnected and you don't have to search through the whole library). I'm just saying it's unlikely that'll happen any time soon.
    I am puzzled, though, what sorts of books you are entering that don't exist in any library catalog? Do you have an example?

    Where I disagree is that edited books are "bibliographical very different":

    In all citation styles I'm aware of, both German and English, the only difference is the addition of ed./Hrsg. in some form. Otherwise they're cited the exact same way (which is why, as bwiernik points out, metadata standards treat them the same; libraries, too, btw -- it's very rare that you can distinguish in a search/filter between monographs and edited books)
  • @bwiernik:
    "Citavi is unusual in handling them separately."

    But this makes Citavi very nice to use.

    @adamsmith:
    "Again, I agree with the second point -- having chapters better associated with edited volumes would be great"

    And not only better connected, but also with a special input-mask for articles in an edited volume, so that you don't have to search the correct input-fields between all the other fields.

    "I am puzzled, though, what sorts of books you are entering that don't exist in any library catalog? Do you have an example?"

    E.g. with research that isn't done in Universities, but in companies. Or with collections of grey literature.
Sign In or Register to comment.