Implementation of the Chicago Manual of Style, 18th edition

edited 6 days ago
After six months of development and testing, I am delighted to announce a major update to the Citation Style Language (CSL) styles for the Chicago Manual of Style, available via the Zotero Style Repository. This rewrite is based on a close section-by-section reading of the 18th edition, significantly expanding the styles’ ability to process the information that CSL can collect. The styles can now produce sensible results for nearly every section of the Manual.

For full technical details, see the notes on changes by section available via GitHub.

Main updates from the 17th to 18th edition

See Chicago’s What’s New in the 18th Edition page for a list of changes. Key differences for citations include:
  • Author limits: Up to six authors now appear in bibliographies, and up to two in notes or in-text citations accompanied by bibliographies. Notes-only styles differ from notes with bibliographies to accommodate a larger number of authors.
  • Shortened notes: Subsequent citations of the same work are now shortened to author–title notes by default; other options include author-only, title-only, and “Ibid.”
  • Journal dates: Months or seasons now appear in fewer circumstances, and not at all if there is a volume and issue, meaning that Chicago's critique of Zotero's date display is no longer a problem. The styles also now support ahead-of-print articles, supplements, special issues, and preprints.
  • Books: The place of publication is no longer required, and page ranges are optional for book chapters. Use one of the "classic" variants available on the repository to retain these features.
  • Bibliographies: Chicago no longer recommends the use of 3-em dashes, preferring to repeat the author’s name. The "classic" variants retain this feature.
The styles also include new or improved support for annotated bibliographies, database and dataset citations, classical and medieval works, audiovisual sources, legal documents, and many other categories.

Expanded variant coverage

The new CSL styles implement more than thirty official Chicago variants. There are four basic systems: in addition to the notes and bibliography and author–date systems, the Manual allows shortened author–title notes and notes without a bibliography. It also gives authors and editors leeway in many smaller details, such as the presentation of references without URLs.

Variants from previous editions that the 18th edition still allows have been grouped into “classic” legacy variants (not an official Chicago term).

Working with the new styles

The styles are designed to match the examples in Chicago’s Citation Quick Guide and the full chapter 14 examples (freely searchable without a subscription). You can explore the variables that each citation type uses through the Zotero Test Items Library. Search for a CMOS section number to see examples encoded from it.

Suppose that you wish to know how to cite a review correctly: Chicago has written a post on the difficulties that this type of citation presents. By searching the CMOS website, you can learn that the Manual covers this topic especially in 14.100 and 14.101. Searching for 14.100 in the Test Items Library will show several examples encoded from this section. In Zotero for desktop, it is also possible to add a Rights column to the display and sort by this to see the examples in the order of the Manual's categories, allowing you to see all the relevant examples from 14.100–102 together. This is especially valuable for citations that rely heavily on the Extra field.

New fields in future Zotero updates

These styles aim to support the full CSL specification. Although Zotero does not yet expose all CSL variables as fields in its interface, this implementation ensures that as new fields are added, Chicago styles will be able to take full advantage of them. For now, you can enter any CSL variable manually via the Extra field. As Zotero adds additional fields, these styles will immediately be able to do something useful with them.

Supporting CSL development

CSL is a volunteer-run, open-source project separate from Zotero. If the Chicago styles support your work, you might consider:Thanks are due to @bwiernik (whose APA styles provided the foundation for the new Chicago styles) and @adamsmith for guidance. I am especially appreciative of the CMOS staff members who saved me from misinterpreting several sections by answering my queries (but they have not reviewed the implementation as a whole).
  • This is great news! Thanks so much for your work on this.

    I may be mistaken, but I think this misreads CMOS 18 slightly. According to 14.30 and 14.31, books published before 1900 should be place only (no publisher), while books published after 1900 should be publisher only (no place). Right now, Zotero is just omitting place from all books, regardless of publication date.
  • Congratulations on this release! I'm in awe how methodological, precise and thorough you've been with this project!
    Thank you for having spent so much time and energy for the scientific/academic community in your free time!
  • edited 6 days ago
    @jdriddle
    may be mistaken, but I think this misreads CMOS 18 slightly. According to 14.30 and 14.31, books published before 1900 should be place only (no publisher), while books published after 1900 should be publisher only (no place).
    See the technical release notes on github on this:

    14.30: A place of publication is no longer required in citations of books. The CSL implementation is not complete, since for books published before 1900, the place of publication only is to be provided, but there is no way to achieve this in CSL 1.0.2.
    Note that the style will print the place of publication if there is no publisher, so that would be a way of getting the right pre-1900 citations, but at the cost of deleting the publisher in your data.
  • Thank you very much! I just made a small one-time donation on Github.
  • Thank you for your work and especially for including the "classic variants" option! I was a little shocked when my beloved 3-em dashes disappeared and I'm glad they're now back.

    My apologies if I missed this, but is there an option to include "ibid. in subsequent citations" with the classic variants? Right now, I only find a Chicago 18th ed. style with ibid. for the styles without classic variants. I (and I imagine others) would appreciate having "ibid." as an option with the classic variants styles, too (without having to edit the code ourselves). Thank you!
  • @adamsmith Understood! Thank you for clarifying. I can make the changes manually.

    My thanks again to you and @dunning for taking on this monumental task. I rely on Zotero and therefore on your all's hard work. Cheers!
  • edited 5 days ago
    Thank you very much for the effort...
    Can you please explain how to edit the fields used in references?
    I am about to submit an article, and found out that some fields that I am using for 'library management', like (Location in Archive and Rights) are displayed in the references. This happens also for Books and Journal Articles (which do not have usually require Location in Archive and Rights). I tried to install earlier styles, but they seem to have been updated to include these fields as well.
  • My apologies if I missed this, but is there an option to include "ibid. in subsequent citations" with the classic variants?
    I was doing all I could to limit the number of variants – this one occurred to me but I left it out as it would result in another four styles to cover notes and shortened notes. I can certainly create these if there is demand for it.
  • I am about to submit an article, and found out that some fields that I am using for 'library management', like (Location in Archive and Rights) are displayed in the references. This happens also for Books and Journal Articles (which do not have usually require Location in Archive and Rights).
    The contents of the Rights, Library Catalogue, and Call Number fields will never appear in Chicago citations. This is also true for nearly all CSL styles, though MLA uses the Library Catalogue field.

    Previously, an archival reference did not appear with journal articles and books, but this did not allow users to meet Chicago's requirements and was not consistent with other CSL styles. The Chicago Manual calls for citing database references for sources consulted online: in the 17th edition, see the examples in sections 14.161 (books) and 14.175 (journal articles). Unfortunately there is no way in CSL/Zotero to distinguish between database and archival references.
Sign In or Register to comment.