Updating references based on their DOI
Newly published journal articles are often available electronically before the final volume, issue, and page numbers are available. Most of these journal articles have DOIs and I was wondering if there are plans to automatically update such records or allow to manually update them based on the DOI (e.g. via pull-down of the DOI field label)?
At the moment, the only 'solution' I have is to either manually add the volume/issue/page (and updated publication year) information OR create a new entry and then merge the old and new entries (e.g. if I made notes to the original entry).
At the moment, the only 'solution' I have is to either manually add the volume/issue/page (and updated publication year) information OR create a new entry and then merge the old and new entries (e.g. if I made notes to the original entry).
Upgrade Storage
https://getquicker.net/Sharedaction?code=78da8f40-e73a-46e8-da6b-08da76a0d1ac
https://s3.amazonaws.com/zotero.org/images/forums/u1357852/9n0b10zwjvgiiekcpmhc.png
If your users understand the value of that feature, they will listen (or read the instructions, or watch the video - don't hesitate to be creative!).
If they don't, well... they were not going to use it even if it was a core functionality.
For context, my institution offers a license for EndNote to all members of the community. In a context where Zotero is the only supported software, and the only way to get complete metadata in their references from AI tools is to download a 3rd party plugin - it would for sure be more feasible. I am still not convinced that the majority would actually do it.
But in a situation where the user can either (a) export to EndNote and use a native feature to work around the incomplete metadata, or (b) export to Zotero, spend time understanding how to download and install a 3rd-party plugin, then run that to work around the incomplete metadata... it seems fair to me to say that users will just opt for EndNote. Which I think is a shame; I think Zotero outperforms EndNote in many ways, particularly for collaborative workflows, but I think the short-term pain point would certainly push many / most users to choose the software that can do what they need right out of the box.
If I have misunderstood you I am very open to new perspectives.
But everyone agrees that updating metadata is a core feature and Zotero is working on it, they just don't tend to release things unless they're entirely happy with how they're working.
I had not realized that you were operating in an officially Endnote context - that's not exactly what I had in mind, my apologies. I can see why you could consider this extra step to gain the desired functionality to be problematic while trying to educate people about a better tool.
With this change of perspective, my point becomes the following: do people actually take advantage of the functionality in Endnote? In my experience, many users will just not notice it unless someone teaches them. And even then, some will just not use it. This means that you need to provide some training/support anyway - and you have the opportunity to explain all the advantages of Zotero, including the fact that it supports plugins. They are really not difficult to install and some of them provide very, very, very cool functionalities. In my opinion it's 100% feasible. Not everybody will listen, but that's just how people are :-)