Sync Issues - Group Members seeing a different amount of articles
I am having a real issue with syncing articles from my desktop group library, to my online group library.
All 3 group members can see the same number of articles in the web group library. However, the main group member who has the desktop version as well as the web, is seeing many more articles on the desktop group library. When trying to synch these so that they appear on the web library, they aren't syncing where it is still show the lesser number.
This is a big issue when screening literature as we are missing out on quite a large chunk of articles that aren't syncing over.
Any advice would be appreciated
All 3 group members can see the same number of articles in the web group library. However, the main group member who has the desktop version as well as the web, is seeing many more articles on the desktop group library. When trying to synch these so that they appear on the web library, they aren't syncing where it is still show the lesser number.
This is a big issue when screening literature as we are missing out on quite a large chunk of articles that aren't syncing over.
Any advice would be appreciated
The Debug code is: D661914496
When looking at the online library, it still only has 26 in one folder where it should have 96 ( i have multiple database folders with similar issue)
Short extract
[JavaScript Error: "The creator name ‘R., Gill, K. D., Mahdi, A. A., Cao, H., Wang, Y., ……’ is too long to sync. Shorten the name and sync again.
If you receive this message repeatedly for items saved from a particular site, you can report this issue in the Zotero Forums." {file: "chrome://zotero/content/xpcom/sync/syncEngine.js" line: 1365}]
[JavaScript Error: "Made no progress during upload -- stopping" {file: "chrome://zotero/content/xpcom/sync/syncEngine.js" line: 1424}]
[JavaScript Error: "Made no progress during upload -- stopping" {file: "chrome://zotero/content/xpcom/sync/syncEngine.js" line: 1424}]
There's unfortunately no shortcut to fixing those items
We were considering programmes like this for our institution, where this was recommended. However, given that its creating a problem when trying to work across groups, I am not sure i'd further recommend it to colleagues.
Surely there is an easy fix to remove or disable the particular field that is causing a problem.
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/comment/427295/#Comment_427295
@dstillman @ZoeCMa we should look at fixing this somehow, though. We've discussed various options in the past, including splitting author fields with >3 commas automatically. I think people get this both when using the Web translator from OVID and when using RIS export -- a bunch of sample RIS snippets are on the forum.
It comes up a bunch and most commonly for people doing systematic reviews or similar (which seem like the only reason to use the atrocious OVID databases....), so when it happens, it likely happens for 100s of items at once and is not realistic to fix manually post import.
I.e. I have personally scanned 2000+ articles and coded before trying to sync the database to the group to then realise there is an issue.
I can only assume this isn't going to be done in the short term future for my current systematic review which means a bit of wasted time on my part.
Being completely honest, the recommended forum post on how to fix it, is well out with my capabilities as I have zero knowledge in code or coding where it looks overly complicated (I'll end up making it worse), so I will probably seek out a different route.
Meanwhile if this is a persistent and "atrocious" problem from a data source, we may petition them for a fix at the root of the problem.
Even if you need to ask someone for help, compared to potentially needing to recode/screen 2k articles, that seems well worthwhile?
This is not an issue with EBSCO, btw. It's just OVID which has, for hard to understand reasons, completely broken export formats (Zoe: we can ask them to fix that, but my understanding is that others, paying customers, have done so in the past with little luck)
Thanks again
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocn.15963?casa_token=2jXGJmSADSgAAAAA:JClJ0cgX6bkrIxUGoQT_giUgw_gben7xXe9XRPek6aZwSxiEaJWkfX-7piEZtkYizbAtD56I_DfXzFE
Is there a way to send you the folder or file that I have imported into the desktop version? That would show you the ones that have issues.
In the item in your library, what does it say in the Library Catalog field?
Did the librarian who sent you these items use something other than Zotero to save/export them?
think we want to make this work or at least not break.
FWIW, I tried exporting that article from our OVID subscription and while the metadata is a bit of a mess, it doesn't break anything. I'm suspecting that part is database specific and affects a subset of OVID data from a specific database CINAHL, maybe?)
The library catalogue field for that particular article in my library is empty.
The librarian ran multiple searches via different databases and then sent me the RIS files to each one of these. I have then imported them all into Zotero separately. Some have synced across into the group library online and others haven't where it doesn't seem to be any database in particular that is causing the issue. For example in the database AMED, I have 96 articles. Only 26 have synced across into the group library online due to the issue with the editor field. Similarly, CINAHL has 939 in my own library but has only synced across 872 into the group library online.
Does that make sense?
Can you send one of the RIS file from the librarian that contains an affected item to support@zotero.org with a link to this thread?
Last, F., Last, F., Last, F.
, but that's not something we could count on, and even here there's sometimes an, et al.
in the middle that would throw off any attempt at automated parsing.We'll consider what if anything we want to do here, but for now, since the A1 (primary author) fields are correct in your files, your best bet is probably just to do a find/replace on these files and remove all the A2 lines, and then import them.
I don't think we'll throw out any useful data that way.
Not sure if this also happens for A1/AU -- that'd be trickier
I imagine this happens for A1/AU sometimes, but seemingly not from whatever this data source was, so I guess this is a place to start.
All example export I could find quickly on the forums has correct A1 and incorrect A2:
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/90252/problems-syncing-records-from-ovid-medline
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/78467/long-creator-name-causes-syncing-not-to-work
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/101616/cannot-sync-because-creator-name-is-too-long
so that suggests we'd fix a lot of the issues by just dropping that.
I do have an open issue suggesting a parsing option for AU/A1:
https://github.com/zotero/translators/issues/2006
but one thing I'm suggesting there is to get sample data and if that's just for A2, we might just do the simple thing and close the issue?