Thanks, that was precisely what I was looking for. It is a little concerning that we cannot explicitly decide the entry type. I was trying to have something as a @Manual in BibLaTex and it seems there is no option in Zotero to automate this.
You can do that using the Better BibTeX add-on. You can't go through the built in Zotero integration in Overleaf, but there are a couple of threads on here that describe how you can set that up to work seamlessly
@adamsmith, Yeah, I just read how to do that, it seems little fiddly. As much as I like Zotero I think might switch over to JabRef since my entire workflow is in LaTeX.
@emilianoeheyns What I mean by fiddly, is if I want complete control of the BibLaTeX entry type and entry fields I will need to basically by hand put everything in the Zotero extra field.
Sure, but if the requirement really is "I want exact control over Biblatex output" rather than just "I want things to work smoothly," the. a native Biblatex app like JabRef really does make more sense
What I mean by fiddly, is if I want complete control of the BibLaTeX entry type and entry fields I will need to basically by hand put everything in the Zotero extra field.
If you have a mapping you want to have applied consistently over all items, that's handled by postscripts. You set that once and then it does the work for you.
Upgrade Storage
There are likely some special cases that require reading more of the code, but mostly that's it.
tex.entrytype: manualin the extra field.