PDF metadata mismatches
Occasionally the metadata retrieved by Zotero for PDF files is not accurate.
I'll post examples of this as I come across them
A paper titled "Information and Communication Technologies, Poverty and Development" is recognized as "Non-surgical retrieval of a broken segment of steel spring guide from the right atrium and inferior vena cava".
The original file is for some reason not indexed in Google Scholar, which might indeed be the problem, but it can be found in the following locations:
http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/di_wp05.htm
http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN015539.pdf
I'll post examples of this as I come across them
A paper titled "Information and Communication Technologies, Poverty and Development" is recognized as "Non-surgical retrieval of a broken segment of steel spring guide from the right atrium and inferior vena cava".
The original file is for some reason not indexed in Google Scholar, which might indeed be the problem, but it can be found in the following locations:
http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/di_wp05.htm
http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN015539.pdf
http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/The_Rise_of_Collective_Intelligence.pdf
It is imported with the metadata of another report from the same series: http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/A_Framework_for_a_National_Broadband_Policy_0.pdf
(however, this doesn't happen viceversa)
(I am reporting on these issues not as a complaint, as I love Zotero - just to help with bugs)
One quick example is:
Modelling and rendering of realistic feathers
So the first thing we need to do is to bump up the page limit.
This article from 2001 came up way wrong:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3061243
(Identified as as 1993 paper in the same journal)