Upgrade StorageStyle Request/search: Refugee Survey Quarterly journal
Hello everyone,
The journal Refugee Survey Quarterly request a quite particular reference style. It is similar to others (like Modern Archelogy B) but it has some small differences, for example, the year is not in brackets and reports need to say "(last visited 20 Jan. 2016)" regarding the website where they were uploaded.
I tried to modify it by myself but I failed.
Does any of you have this reference style?
Many thanks!
P.S: Here the whole style sheet from the journal:
https://academic.oup.com/DocumentLibrary/RSQ/rsq style sheet for authors.pdf
The journal Refugee Survey Quarterly request a quite particular reference style. It is similar to others (like Modern Archelogy B) but it has some small differences, for example, the year is not in brackets and reports need to say "(last visited 20 Jan. 2016)" regarding the website where they were uploaded.
I tried to modify it by myself but I failed.
Does any of you have this reference style?
Many thanks!
P.S: Here the whole style sheet from the journal:
https://academic.oup.com/DocumentLibrary/RSQ/rsq style sheet for authors.pdf
-
adamsmithhttps://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/wiki/Requesting-Styles
-
joycekwcIf you only have a few small edits to make to an existing style, try using the Visual Citation Editor: https://editor.citationstyles.org/visualEditor/. You can upload the closest style you have, click on the bit of the sample citation you want to remove (eg brackets), and it will take you to the part of the code you need to edit in a way that is more user-friendly. You can then save the modified code. (By the way, I couldn't see the Modern Archaeology B style in the repository, otherwise I'd have taken a closer look to see what needs fixing).
-
adamsmithWe actually just added the style courtesy of @damnation https://www.zotero.org/styles?q=id:refugee-survey-quarterly
-
joycekwcThat's great - swift work!
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.