Newspaper name repeated in bibliography when including multiple citations (Chicago author-date)
I am citing multiple articles from the same newspaper, Yomiuri Shimbun in a book chapter I'm writing.
(Please don't @ me about the m in shimbun; I have reasons for that)
When I output the bibliography (Chicago author-date), I get:
Yomiuri Shimbun. 1941. “Katei seikatsu mo ōyake no mono: Habuke muda to rōhi, Kiribuchi joshi,” December 8, 1941.
Yomiuri Shimbun. ———. 1942. “‘Koko ni muda ari’: Orekireki no gomi shigen tansaku,” August 15, 1942.
Yomiuri Shimbun. ———. 1943a. “Umai eiyōshoku, haikyū ryō de kufū, shinshun kara Senji Shokuryō Kenkyūjo,” January 4, 1943.
etc.
In other words, the newspaper name is repeated before the em dashes. I believe this to be an error. Am I correct? If so, how can I fix it?
Thanks as always!
(Please don't @ me about the m in shimbun; I have reasons for that)
When I output the bibliography (Chicago author-date), I get:
Yomiuri Shimbun. 1941. “Katei seikatsu mo ōyake no mono: Habuke muda to rōhi, Kiribuchi joshi,” December 8, 1941.
Yomiuri Shimbun. ———. 1942. “‘Koko ni muda ari’: Orekireki no gomi shigen tansaku,” August 15, 1942.
Yomiuri Shimbun. ———. 1943a. “Umai eiyōshoku, haikyū ryō de kufū, shinshun kara Senji Shokuryō Kenkyūjo,” January 4, 1943.
etc.
In other words, the newspaper name is repeated before the em dashes. I believe this to be an error. Am I correct? If so, how can I fix it?
Thanks as always!
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
@fbennett any chance you could look at this? Happens with any two newspaper items with no author and same publication title in Chicago author-date
I already owed you a coffee or three anyway, so the debt is just piling on...