Title caser errors out
@dstillman Report ID is 1510776339.
Debug id is D1999891034
As I try to export this article zotero gives error 'An error occurred generating your bibliography. '
For reproducing issue:
I dont know which steps will helps to reproducing the issue. But you can suggest me if there is a way.
Debug id is D1999891034
As I try to export this article zotero gives error 'An error occurred generating your bibliography. '
For reproducing issue:
I dont know which steps will helps to reproducing the issue. But you can suggest me if there is a way.
Chicago
but just because I knew that style would invoke the Citeproc title caser. We did at least one with all extensions disabled, and then he gets but thatstr.trim is not a function
is because the last element after the string split is a float instead of an empty string.edit: this was with all extensions removed (right @parthpatel ?)
@parthpatel: In addition to a Debug ID with BBT uninstalled, we need Steps to Reproduce, as explained on that page — you need to tell us exactly what we would do to get this to happen, including downloading or creating the exact item that you're seeing it on. (You can also export the affected item to Zotero RDF, upload it somewhere, and provide a link here, and you should test that it still happens for you after reimporting that item.)
@parthpatel from what I can tell it doesn't matter which reference you pick as long as the language field is empty (or set to English, but let's keep it simple).
Steps to reproduce were:
- copy "@article{article,.....}" to the clipboard
- select "Import from clipboard" in Zotero
and then I can create a Chicago bibliography using the steps above without problems. @parthpatel can you verify that this still gives you the error?But indeed: what .sh file? There's no .sh file in the Zotero tarball.
The debug id is D82336233
Report id is 522636894.
I am sharing the reference with rdf file which is causing errors.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1h10-i7s6GfWMiDKwmvr2_S1sEC3LHUex?usp=sharing
Have to agree though -- I can't think of a good reason to run 32 bit these days unless you're on a *really* old system.
You can try running
grep flags /proc/cpuinfo | grep ' lm '
in a shell. If that gets you lines starting withflags
, you have a 64-bit capable P4. Performance should be the same (or in some specific instances, better) with x64.I ran grep flags /proc/cpuinfo | grep ' lm '
```
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pebs bts cpuid pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr pti
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pebs bts cpuid pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr pti
```
I think its 64 bit capable P4. But installing OS is cumbursome in this PC. Its not even detecting bootable pendrive.
If not, it *is* possible to resize your harddisk, install a minimal 64 bit Ubuntu, boot to that and reclaim the space previously used for the 32 bit install, but it's a bit of a hassle (https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/installation-guide/powerpc/apds04.html, https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/434485/installing-linux-from-existing-installation)
I find it mildly amusing to think that it's hard to procure new hardware for security reasons yet you would be allowed to install a new (potentially unsafe) OS on an existing system, but I work in academia so I'm no stranger to bizarre red tape:
me: "network outlet doesn't work anymore?"
IT: "oh, you need to get new systems registered before they can be plugged in, and only 10 systems can be registered per outlet"
me: "We work with RasPis and Arduinos, I have 20 'systems' sitting on my own desk right now. This is a tech research lab"
IT: "yeah sorry, policy"
me: "can I get the mac address of this totally not an el-cheapo second hand router from ebay registered?"
IT: "sure, no problem, done"
Yeah..!!
Everywhere IT is same..!! :D
Thanks I will try out..