Chicago 16 ed. - functioning like Chicago 17 ed. regarding 'short title'
Dear all,
The ibid/short title update for Chicago 17 ed. is described here:
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/68139/chicago-manual-of-style-citation-styles-updated-to-17th-edition.
However, I am using the Chicago style 16 ed. (full note, no ibid) in my Word document Zotero preferences, but it is functioning in the same way as described above. I prefer the 16 style and want the short title at all times.
Does anyone know if the Chicago 16 ed. style was also updated to function like Chicago 17 ed.?
Thanks,
Simon
The ibid/short title update for Chicago 17 ed. is described here:
https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/68139/chicago-manual-of-style-citation-styles-updated-to-17th-edition.
However, I am using the Chicago style 16 ed. (full note, no ibid) in my Word document Zotero preferences, but it is functioning in the same way as described above. I prefer the 16 style and want the short title at all times.
Does anyone know if the Chicago 16 ed. style was also updated to function like Chicago 17 ed.?
Thanks,
Simon
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
<citation>
section of either Chicago (full note)—the 17th edition version—or chicago-fullnote-bibliography-16th-edition.csl to get the other behavior.https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Ca7w3as3l/styles/a0fd7ffe7720f7dd9f8f94b8a9fba1b4afb34ebd/chicago-fullnote-bibliography-no-ibid.csl
note that you'll need to change title/link/id to prevent it from auto-updating to the 17th edition.