To beta, or not to beta
Hi Guys,
I am currently running WinXP Pro SP3, OO 3.01, Firefox 3.08 and Zotero 1.09.
I have an extensive library and use it to augment technical reports.
I have teetered on upgrading to Zotero 1.5 for several months now but find I still have concerns that there will be problems upgrading or running the 'beta' version.
I do not necessarily need sync, as I only have one main machine.
I thought it might be useful to ask you what issues you encountered upgrading, if any, or is the 'beta' tag primarily related to the sync capability and I am missing a wide variety of functional improvements (e.g. style manger) by not upgrading.
Simon
I am currently running WinXP Pro SP3, OO 3.01, Firefox 3.08 and Zotero 1.09.
I have an extensive library and use it to augment technical reports.
I have teetered on upgrading to Zotero 1.5 for several months now but find I still have concerns that there will be problems upgrading or running the 'beta' version.
I do not necessarily need sync, as I only have one main machine.
I thought it might be useful to ask you what issues you encountered upgrading, if any, or is the 'beta' tag primarily related to the sync capability and I am missing a wide variety of functional improvements (e.g. style manger) by not upgrading.
Simon
1.5b2 generally works more smoothly for me (especially the Ooo plugin) than 1.09
I think general consensus is that the beta refers to the sync (which still is a little buggy).
I strongly recommend the upgrade from my perspective.
I'd like to know which version makes me possible to cite and create bibliographies in Word processor. As I see, citing pluggins of beta version does not permit working with text processors yet, am I wrong?
Thanks
I'm working with:
W XP
Firefox 3.0 with zotero 1.5 beta version
Openoffice 3.0
and the zotero plugin 2.0a2
Actually I have not problems but, anybody has detected any setback while was working whith this combination?