et al. in bibliography as (...)
The bibliography entry for a multiauthored paper should look like:
Blackburn, T.M., Essl, F., Evans, T., Hulme, P.E., Jeschke, J.M., Kühn, I., Kumschick, S., Marková, Z., Mrugała, A., (…) & Bacher, S. 2014. A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology 12: e1001850.
I get something similar without brackets and ampersand with
<name et-al-min="11" et-al-use-first="9" et-al-use-last="true" delimiter-precedes-last="always" initialize-with="." name-as-sort-order="all"/>
Is it possible to adapt the et-al term for the brackets and the ampersand? At least I wasn't successful.
Blackburn, T.M., Essl, F., Evans, T., Hulme, P.E., Jeschke, J.M., Kühn, I., Kumschick, S., Marková, Z., Mrugała, A., (…) & Bacher, S. 2014. A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biology 12: e1001850.
I get something similar without brackets and ampersand with
<name et-al-min="11" et-al-use-first="9" et-al-use-last="true" delimiter-precedes-last="always" initialize-with="." name-as-sort-order="all"/>
Is it possible to adapt the et-al term for the brackets and the ampersand? At least I wasn't successful.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
Since I am in the Editorial Boards of the first two and Editor-In-Charge of the latter I will promote the CSL styles as soon as they meet the journal rules.