Upgrade StorageRTF SCAN Issue
Dear Friends
I am currently using Zotero as my mais bibliographical software. Due to my needs, I have to use a RTF scan to order to generate my citations and references. However, a problem has stricked me. In the ordinary stile an one author article, for example, the RTF code would be something like:
{Smith, 2002}
Hoewever, many of my articles have two authors, sucha as:
Kress, G., e T. van Leeuwen. 2002. “Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour”. visual communication 1: 343–68.
I already tied to quote it in the following codes, all unsuccesfuly
{Kress; van Leeuwen, 2002}
{Kress and van Leeuwen, 2002}
{Kress e van Leeuwen, 2002}
{Kress, van Leeuwen, 2002}
COuld somenone help me on this?
I am currently using Zotero as my mais bibliographical software. Due to my needs, I have to use a RTF scan to order to generate my citations and references. However, a problem has stricked me. In the ordinary stile an one author article, for example, the RTF code would be something like:
{Smith, 2002}
Hoewever, many of my articles have two authors, sucha as:
Kress, G., e T. van Leeuwen. 2002. “Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour”. visual communication 1: 343–68.
I already tied to quote it in the following codes, all unsuccesfuly
{Kress; van Leeuwen, 2002}
{Kress and van Leeuwen, 2002}
{Kress e van Leeuwen, 2002}
{Kress, van Leeuwen, 2002}
COuld somenone help me on this?
-
noksagtHave you tried using just the first author: {Kress, 2002}
-
kithaironIf you can, try using the odf-scan plug-in from here. In practice this is a lot more versatile and robust than the rtf-scan option. (You'll need to use one of the office-suites to use the odf (.odt) file-format – at least for the scanning process.)
-
rll307Thank you! guys! the odt scan works fine
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.