[Style PATCH] Organization Science

spaetz

I needed a citation style for Organization Science (an INFORMS journal), and there was none, so I created one based on the generic Harvard template. It might not be perfect yet, but it is a good start. How do I go about to add it to the user-supplied templates?

Find the .csl style here: http://sspaeth.de/uploads/INFORMS_OrganizationScience.csl

Feedback and Comments welcome
Thanks
Sebastian

dstillman

http://www.zotero.org/styles/organization-science

http://www.zotero.org/styles/organization-science?install=1 to install into Zotero

spaetz

Thanks for your quick tweaks Dan. However, as I posted to the google group my style does not validate in validator.nu and is shown as invalid in the style repository. Weirdly enough the error I get is in the schema:

Error: Undeclared prefix dc.
At line 8, column 1 in resource http://xbiblio.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/xbiblio/csl/schema/trunk/csl.rnc

Any hint appreciated. Hope someone finds the style useful.

Rintze

You're validating against the development version of the CSL schema, which isn't (yet) supported by Zotero. Try this link:

http://xbiblio.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/xbiblio/csl/schema/tags/0.8/csl.rnc

(I'll update the documentation on the wiki as well)

Also, it might be I broke the development schema by inserting an annotation at line 7, which would explain your error. Will look into it.

spaetz

Thanks for the quick reply. I have been using the above scheme and indeed got a more sensible result: I was using <sort> in the citation field which was not accepted. I have removed that now and it validates just fine. Hopefully the update version will soon be available.

I was just following the wiki description of how to validate a style and that told me to use the trunk of csl.rnc. Thanks for updating the wiki to a working procedure. I have to say, creating a working style was easier than I thought it would be.

Rintze

The sort-element must be included before the layout-element. The documentation that will be released with the new schema will discuss this.

Also, the trunk schema was indeed invalid (https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/xbiblio/changeset/1169).

spaetz

Thanks Rintze for fixing the schema and explaing that. Much appreciated.