bibtex export help
Hi
i am sorry for disturbing. i have a problem . when i export my files as betterbibtex
my article titles
Lipoid proteinosis: Clinical features and electron microscopic study
exported as
Lipoid Proteinosis: {{Clinical}} Features and Electron Microscopic Study
or some other problem like
(95 % CI 266 to 617 days)
exported as
(95\% CI 266 to 617 days)
and there are more. I think i should change some settings. Could you help me ? Thanks
i am sorry for disturbing. i have a problem . when i export my files as betterbibtex
my article titles
Lipoid proteinosis: Clinical features and electron microscopic study
exported as
Lipoid Proteinosis: {{Clinical}} Features and Electron Microscopic Study
or some other problem like
(95 % CI 266 to 617 days)
exported as
(95\% CI 266 to 617 days)
and there are more. I think i should change some settings. Could you help me ? Thanks
@incollection{citekey,
title = {95% CI 266 to 617 days},
author = {Bentele, G{\"u}nter}
}
does not render on Overleaf for me.
\%
will work everywhere.%
? It's mandatory.%
means "act as if the rest of the line does not exist" (used for comments in the doc usually), and because the closing brace of the title is dropped by that behavior, the entry is invalid.for example a article title
Value of {{Pentraxin3}} ({{PTX3}}) in {{Patients}} with {{Neovascular Age}}-Related {{Macular Degeneration}}.
and
years duration of T1DM (p{$<$}0.001 for both).
or
62.4 (+/-12.1) (normally 62.4 ± 12.1
is it normal or not i dont know. I wonder can i fix this problem.
The second is just how you enter a lesser-than sign in latex. A bare lesser-than means an inverted question mark or exclamation mark in latex (I always forget which of the two).
The last one is because you have "plain text commands" export on in Better BibTeX. If you turn that off, that problem will just go away.
Except the last choice that better bibtex makes, all the points you've brought are standard bibtex formatting. I think you expect to find things in the bibtex format (not just better bibtex, but the format itself) that are just against how the format works, and I highly doubt that tiddlywiki has a passable bibtex parser. So these are errors in the tiddlywiki bibtex parser you use, not errors in better bibtex.
You might be better off using a CSV export from zotero. Those are easier to parse.