Upgrade StorageEditing SFECAG existing style
Hello
There's already a related topic : https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/82107/sfecag-colloquium-style/p1
I have seen on the googlesheets that this style is considered as completed :
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zc3Sl4JU7Ltu0Q55-OB0QYCJbYiguVXwpc_BzBLLZcA/edit#gid=1797918347
But there is some important corrections to do before to consider it as complete.
The citations must be in the text and not in footnotes (format). Right now, the name of - the authors is not like in the example : HALL (P. A.), SOSKICE (D.)
Now, it's : P. A. HALL, D. SOSKICE
I have found the line to add parenthesis to the given name () in another style, but not the way to sort : Family names Given name instead.
<name-part name="given" prefix="(" suffix=")"/
For chapter of book and book, the collection/serie must be after the year.
I have no news of the author of the source code and if the modifications are planned.
Thanks
There's already a related topic : https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/82107/sfecag-colloquium-style/p1
I have seen on the googlesheets that this style is considered as completed :
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zc3Sl4JU7Ltu0Q55-OB0QYCJbYiguVXwpc_BzBLLZcA/edit#gid=1797918347
But there is some important corrections to do before to consider it as complete.
The citations must be in the text and not in footnotes (format). Right now, the name of - the authors is not like in the example : HALL (P. A.), SOSKICE (D.)
Now, it's : P. A. HALL, D. SOSKICE
I have found the line to add parenthesis to the given name () in another style, but not the way to sort : Family names Given name instead.
<name-part name="given" prefix="(" suffix=")"/
For chapter of book and book, the collection/serie must be after the year.
I have no news of the author of the source code and if the modifications are planned.
Thanks
-
adamsmithPlease continue in your original thread, no need to create a new one.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.