Upgrade StorageImporting bibitem in tex file
Can we import the references in the following formate into zotero? Those are items cited in my old papers. Thanks.
\bibitem{Aksoylu.B;Bond.S;Holst.M2003}
B.~Aksoylu, S.~Bond, and M.~Holst.
\newblock An adyssey into local refinement and multilevel preconditioning
{III}: Implementation and numerical experiments.
\newblock {\em SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing}, 25(2):478--498, 2003.
\bibitem{Aksoylu.B;Holst.M2006}
B.~Aksoylu and M.~Holst.
\newblock Optimality of multilevel preconditioners for local mesh refinement in
three dimensions.
\newblock {\em SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis}, 44(3):1005--1025, 2006.
\bibitem{Alliez.P;Cohen-Steiner.D;Yvinec.M;Desbrun.M2005a}
P.~Alliez, D.~Cohen-Steiner, M.~Yvinec, and M.~Desbrun.
\newblock Variational tetrahedral meshing.
\newblock {\em ACM Transactions on Graphics}, 24(3):617--625, 2005.
\bibitem{Aksoylu.B;Bond.S;Holst.M2003}
B.~Aksoylu, S.~Bond, and M.~Holst.
\newblock An adyssey into local refinement and multilevel preconditioning
{III}: Implementation and numerical experiments.
\newblock {\em SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing}, 25(2):478--498, 2003.
\bibitem{Aksoylu.B;Holst.M2006}
B.~Aksoylu and M.~Holst.
\newblock Optimality of multilevel preconditioners for local mesh refinement in
three dimensions.
\newblock {\em SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis}, 44(3):1005--1025, 2006.
\bibitem{Alliez.P;Cohen-Steiner.D;Yvinec.M;Desbrun.M2005a}
P.~Alliez, D.~Cohen-Steiner, M.~Yvinec, and M.~Desbrun.
\newblock Variational tetrahedral meshing.
\newblock {\em ACM Transactions on Graphics}, 24(3):617--625, 2005.
-
adamsmithNo. That's not in any way structured citation data -- it's just a bibliography written in tex. If this is really all you have (rather than the .bib file(s) used to assemble the document, which you can import into Zotero), your best bet is probably to just go to the formatted papers and use anystyle.io to parts them.
-
lyc102Thanks.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.