PLoS journals attaching snapshot even if I don't want it
Any time i save a cite from a PLoS journal it attaches a snapshot, even though I unchecked the "automatically save snapshot" option. I looked in the translator and it's very short and I don't see any obvious place where it is attaching a snapshot so I'm not sure how to fix it.
eg: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005655
using the PLoS Journals.js translator in zotero 2.0b4
Thanks,
Keith
eg: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005655
using the PLoS Journals.js translator in zotero 2.0b4
Thanks,
Keith
ATM you can only turn off associating any file including pdfs (by deselecting the pdf and other files) option, or get both the pdf and the snapshot from translators.
Afaik that is the case for all translators, not just PLOS.
That would be a pretty annoying strategy anyway, as I always want it to grab PDFs, and never found snapshots particularly useful (especially when backing up/restoring all those little files for all my cites)
So at least on my computer, the PLOS translator is the only one that seems to ignore the setting.
This afternoon I rewrote part of the PLoS translator, and submitted it to the Zotero team. It should fix multiple limitations/issues, including this one.
The larger issue is that the snapshot pref probably shouldn't affect translators and should just be used for "Create New Item from Current Page". For translators, a snapshot should probably only be saved when it's full-text content such as a New York Times article and should be part of the download pref—and not the snapshot pref. (There could possibly be a "large files" sub-pref there to allow people to exclude, say, multi-megabyte YouTube videos while still saving NYT articles, but conceptually speaking it should be the same pref.)
Web link attachments, which is what, for example, the Amazon translator saves (i.e., non-canonical related links), should either be saved regardless or should be a separate new pref.
Don't get me wrong. I love snapshots for certain things, understand their usefulness, and appreciate all the work you guys have done to implement it, but it is the single-file versus many-file thing that I would like to at least have some control over.