Customising citation style works not as expected
Hi everyone, I have two related questions about customising citation styles.
For my document, I need a style whereby in-text citations are mentioned as footnotes, with only Name+Year as the details given in each footnote. It seems the "Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (note)" style (which is Name+Title) comes closest, as it only needs customising to change Title into Year.
To that end, I followed Zotero documentation and tried to download this modified style from the Zotero Style Repository. However, there, the preview that it shows me is very different (much more details is shown, and NO footnotes) from how this style is (correctly) applied in my document. How can I modify the style as desired?
Also: can the FootnoteText style, that Zotero employs to list the references, be laid out on 2/3 columns? I see no such option in the style settings, and there seems anyway to be a bug (see my previous thread) with how Zotero actually follows style settings for listing references! If I change the footnote settings directly from Word's ribbon, Zotero makes a mess of the footnote section, so it probably has to be done through Zotero somehow.
Using Word 2016, Zotero 4.0.29.22, Firefox 55.0.3, Win 7. Many thanks!
For my document, I need a style whereby in-text citations are mentioned as footnotes, with only Name+Year as the details given in each footnote. It seems the "Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (note)" style (which is Name+Title) comes closest, as it only needs customising to change Title into Year.
To that end, I followed Zotero documentation and tried to download this modified style from the Zotero Style Repository. However, there, the preview that it shows me is very different (much more details is shown, and NO footnotes) from how this style is (correctly) applied in my document. How can I modify the style as desired?
Also: can the FootnoteText style, that Zotero employs to list the references, be laid out on 2/3 columns? I see no such option in the style settings, and there seems anyway to be a bug (see my previous thread) with how Zotero actually follows style settings for listing references! If I change the footnote settings directly from Word's ribbon, Zotero makes a mess of the footnote section, so it probably has to be done through Zotero somehow.
Using Word 2016, Zotero 4.0.29.22, Firefox 55.0.3, Win 7. Many thanks!
General instructions for editing styles here:
https://www.zotero.org/support/dev/citation_styles/style_editing_step-by-step
For you, the easiest would be to download the Chicago author-date style and change
class=“in-text”
in the first line toclass=“note”
If you don’t want parentheses around the author-date, delete the prefix and suffix under the
citation
section.Regarding your second question. No, Zotero just tells Word to insert a footnote using its built in system. Word has no ability to collapse footnotes like that.
I've edited my custom style accordingly, and saved it under c:\..\zotero\styles\
However, this new style is not visible under the list of citation styles in Zotero's document preferences (in Word).
Zotero appears to simply have overwritten the base Chicago style, which would have been fine with me, except that there is a bug here as well: while old citations are formatted according to the CSL, new citations seem to be added in accordance with how the style was before I edited it, e.g. with the ( and ) pre/suffix.
This bug interacts with the other one I've reported, whereby in-text citations do not (always) follow settings of the FootnoteText style that should govern them. Therefore, not only is the citation inserted according to an obsolete template - the font size for it is not good either!
Is there no easier way to create a custom style and have it applied consistently to a document, without issues intefering that relate to old/built-in styles?
Thanks!
- change the filename: chicago-longtalker.csl
- open the file and change the ID and self-link to match that to chicago-longtalker.csl
Then you can use both styles and it won't get overwritten if a new chicago style comes out.
Somehow you then also need to refresh the style in your Word document.
After installing it from the Cite menu under Zotero Preferences, the style now show up as an available style under the Zotero Word Preferences. However, the citations are all a mess, which is indeed reflected in the CSL: when I open it, the changes I had made to make the references appear in footnotes, and with no brackets as a prefix/suffix, are all gone.
Sorry that I am catching on slow with this...
for the ID and self link put it like http://www.zotero.org/styles/chicago-longtalker.
Then go into Zotero's preferences - cite - styles - use the + button and find the style and install it.
So I created a copy of the built-in chicago-note-bibliography.csl, which I named _MC.csl ; I edited that file to read:
_MC
http://www.zotero.org/styles/_MC
The style shows up in Word, and (at least in a new sandbox document that Ic reated to test this) seems to format the references as expected rather than create the mess it did in my main doc.
Now all I need is to customise the default template (which includes DOI, page numbers etc), to the following simplified template:
FirstAuthor et al.: "Title" (journal, year)
However the contents of the tag in _MC.csl, too long to paste here, don't seem to contain anything related to DOI etc that I could just edit to fit my desired template...
What is it that you want exactly? I'm not getting it.
I have a large doc, and its references need to be put in footnotes, according to the template:
FirstAuthor et al.: "Title" (journal, year)
Is this style for any specific journal/uni?
Author, 'Title'
..into the one I want, which involves adding "(journal, year") at the end?
This is just a particular style that the organisation that will get this document (the EU) want people to use!..
Regarding the either issues, can @adamsmith help with this?
http://editor.citationstyles.org/visualEditor/
The CSL variable for journal title is container-title
Beyond that, the linked step by step instructions above do go through each step you need to follow to edit the style by hand yourself.
Chicago is an extremely robust style, but makes it a lot harder to edit (and understand for a beginner). This style has a lot of lot of predefined macros, so it's harder to get where what is happening.
Here is a rought draft that'll give you an idea.
https://gist.github.com/POBrien333/781f8598083b62fb756a220f28f8413e